Model comparison
Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Google
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads 24.8 to 8.7.
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.0 Pro | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | |
| Noometry Index | 27.1 | 32.2 |
| Released | 2023-12-13 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 24 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 31.6 (#270), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.6 (#222)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1210 |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |
Reasoning Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 16.4 (#292), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 22.6 (#174)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1208 |
| DTBench | 45.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 116.97 | — |
Math Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 8.7 (#315), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 24.8 (#255)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1208 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 16.1% |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |
Knowledge Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.5 (#286), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.2 (#274)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 41.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 28.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | — |
| MMLU | 70% | — |
Multilingual Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.5 (#247), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.0 (#243)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 1160 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1192 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 1187 |
| LMArena French | 1144 | — |
| LMArena German | 1125 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1118 | — |
Instruction Following Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.9 (#262), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.8 (#238)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1186 |
| IFEval | — | 78% |
Long Context Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#244), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#229)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1194 |
Writing & Preference Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.2 (#259), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.3 (#231)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1218 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1130 | 1199 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 1221 |
| WildBench | — | 73.4% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.6 versus 31.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.