Model comparison
Llama 3.2 90B vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads 24.8 to 10.4.
Side by side
| Llama 3.2 90B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 27.1 | 32.2 |
| Released | 2024-09-24 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.6 (#222)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1210 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: 29.7 (#73), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | 27.3% | — |
Reasoning Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Llama 3.2 90B: 20.9 (#207), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 22.6 (#174)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | 0.4% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1208 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 125.5 | — |
Math Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Llama 3.2 90B: 10.4 (#302), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 24.8 (#255)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.6% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 16.1% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1208 |
| MATH Level 5 | 39.4% | — |
Knowledge Llama 3.2 90B leads
Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#269), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.2 (#274)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 41% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 41.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 28.7% |
| MMLU | 80.3% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: 24.9 (#119), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1000 | — |
| GeoBench | 52% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.0 (#243)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1160 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1192 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1187 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.8 (#238)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | — | 78% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1186 |
Long Context Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#229)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1194 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.3 (#231)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1218 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1199 |
| WildBench | — | 73.4% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1221 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 3.2 90B better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 90B and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.2 90B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.