Model comparison
Mistral Nemo vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AI
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads 35.5 to 12.3.
- Mistral Nemo has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Mistral Nemo | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 26.4 | 38.8 |
| Released | 2024-07-01 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.15 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.15 | — |
| Results tracked | 10 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1314 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#125), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: —
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 27.6% | — |
| BALROG | 17.6% | — |
Reasoning Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Mistral Nemo: 20.7 (#232), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1299 |
| DTBench | 48.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 118.68 | — |
| PIQA | 83.5% | — |
Math Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Mistral Nemo: 25.5 (#268), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1298 |
| MATH Level 5 | 10.8% | — |
| GSM8K | 84.2% | — |
Knowledge Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#298), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 29.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1289 |
| BoolQ | 82.5% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1314 |
| LMArena German | — | 1231 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1207 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1271 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1275 |
Long Context Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1292 |
Writing & Preference Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Mistral Nemo: 28.5 (#296), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1262 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 881 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1299 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Mistral Nemo better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Mistral Nemo and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Nemo has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.