Model comparison

Qwen Turbo vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Qwen Turbo Alibaba (Qwen)

27.1

Rank #335 Reported

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 Alibaba (Qwen)

38.8

Rank #181 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads 36.1 to 15.3.

Side by side

Qwen Turbo and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 specifications
Qwen TurboQwen2.5 Plus 1127
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)Alibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index27.138.8
Released2024-11-01—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M—
Max output16K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.05—
Output $ / M tokens$0.20—
Results tracked314

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Qwen Turbo: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen TurboQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Coding—1314

Reasoning Not comparable

Qwen Turbo: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen TurboQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Hard Prompts—1299

Math Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads

Qwen Turbo: 15.3 (#297), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen TurboQwen2.5 Plus 1127
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20256.1%—
LMArena Math—1298
MATH Level 556.2%—

Knowledge Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads

Qwen Turbo: 22.2 (#272), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen TurboQwen2.5 Plus 1127
GPQA Diamond41.8%—
LMArena Expert—1289

Multilingual Not comparable

Qwen Turbo: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen TurboQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Non-English—1265
LMArena Chinese—1314
LMArena German—1231
LMArena Japanese—1207
LMArena Russian—1271

Instruction Following Not comparable

Qwen Turbo: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen TurboQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Instruction Following—1275

Long Context Not comparable

Qwen Turbo: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen TurboQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Longer Query—1292

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Qwen Turbo: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen TurboQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Text—1299
LMArena Creative Writing—1262
LMArena Multi-Turn—1299

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen Turbo better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Qwen Turbo and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen Turbo has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper