Model comparison
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 vs Qwen3-1.7B
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 26.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads 33.5 to 15.4.
- Qwen3-1.7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Qwen3-1.7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 38.1 | 26.2 |
| Released | — | 2025-04-29 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 14 | 4 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 37.9 (#171), Qwen3-1.7B: —
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1314 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: —, Qwen3-1.7B: 24.5 (#108)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 28.4% |
Reasoning Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 24.8 (#139), Qwen3-1.7B: 18.5 (#263)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1299 | — |
Math Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 33.5 (#175), Qwen3-1.7B: 15.4 (#288)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 8.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1298 | — |
Knowledge Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 34.9 (#179), Qwen3-1.7B: 19.6 (#273)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 38% |
| LMArena Expert | 1289 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 42.1 (#196), Qwen3-1.7B: —
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1265 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1314 | — |
| LMArena German | 1231 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1207 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1271 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.4 (#194), Qwen3-1.7B: —
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1275 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#180), Qwen3-1.7B: —
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1292 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.5 (#186), Qwen3-1.7B: —
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1299 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1262 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1299 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better than Qwen3-1.7B?
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 26.2 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 and Qwen3-1.7B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-1.7B has 4.