Model comparison
Ministral 3B vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 25.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AI
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads 34.9 to 10.4.
- Ministral 3B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Ministral 3B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 25.6 | 38.1 |
| Released | 2024-10-01 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.04 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.04 | — |
| Results tracked | 6 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Ministral 3B: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 37.9 (#171)
| Benchmark | Ministral 3B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1314 |
Reasoning Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Ministral 3B: 17.7 (#278), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 24.8 (#139)
| Benchmark | Ministral 3B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1299 |
| DTBench | 51.7% | — |
| LMCA | 5.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 118.08 | — |
Math Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Ministral 3B: 24.5 (#257), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 33.5 (#175)
| Benchmark | Ministral 3B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1298 |
| MATH Level 5 | 14.4% | — |
Knowledge Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Ministral 3B: 10.4 (#297), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 34.9 (#179)
| Benchmark | Ministral 3B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 25.3% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 7.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1289 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Ministral 3B: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 42.1 (#196)
| Benchmark | Ministral 3B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1314 |
| LMArena German | — | 1231 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1207 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1271 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Ministral 3B: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.4 (#194)
| Benchmark | Ministral 3B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1275 |
Long Context Not comparable
Ministral 3B: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#180)
| Benchmark | Ministral 3B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1292 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Ministral 3B: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.5 (#186)
| Benchmark | Ministral 3B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1299 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Ministral 3B better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 25.6 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Ministral 3B and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Ministral 3B has 6 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.