Model comparison

Mistral Medium vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 36.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

Mistral Medium Mistral AI

36.3

Rank #218 Confirmed

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 Alibaba (Qwen)

38.8

Rank #181 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral Medium scores higher in 4 categories and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 4 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mistral Medium leads 60.0 to 49.4.
  • Mistral Medium has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Mistral Medium and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 specifications
Mistral MediumQwen2.5 Plus 1127
ProviderMistral AIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index36.338.8
Released2023-12-11—
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window262K—
Max output262K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.50—
Output $ / M tokens$7.50—
Results tracked3614

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads

Mistral Medium: 34.2 (#243), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral MediumQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Coding14341314
FrontierCode8%—
SciCode40.2%—
WeirdML43.7%—
ALE-Bench763.98—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Mistral Medium: 28.3 (#90), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral MediumQwen2.5 Plus 1127
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard37.7%—

Reasoning Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads

Mistral Medium: 24.0 (#167), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral MediumQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Hard Prompts14261299
Kagi LLM Benchmark50%—
CritPt0%—
DTBench75.5%—
LMCA26.1%—
Surface Evolver Bench26.9%—

Math Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads

Mistral Medium: 28.1 (#245), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral MediumQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Math14081298
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202532.2%—
ProofBench9%—
MATH Level 581.6%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)0.3%—

Knowledge Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads

Mistral Medium: 25.0 (#265), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral MediumQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Expert14081289
GPQA Diamond59.5%—
Humanity's Last Exam4.5%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate22.7%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Mistral Medium: 35.3 (#88), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral MediumQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Vision1172—

Multilingual Mistral Medium leads

Mistral Medium: 52.1 (#91), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral MediumQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Non-English14081265
LMArena Chinese14471314
LMArena German14321231
LMArena Japanese13781207
LMArena Russian14111271
LMArena French1459—
LMArena Korean1380—
LMArena Spanish1433—

Instruction Following Mistral Medium leads

Mistral Medium: 73.7 (#116), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral MediumQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Instruction Following13981275

Long Context Mistral Medium leads

Mistral Medium: 42.9 (#114), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral MediumQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Longer Query14061292

Writing & Preference Mistral Medium leads

Mistral Medium: 60.0 (#103), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral MediumQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Text14241299
LMArena Creative Writing13911262
LMArena Multi-Turn14181299
Short-Story Creative Writing77.3%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Mistral Medium better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 36.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Mistral Medium or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.5 versus 34.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Mistral Medium and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Medium has 36 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper