Model comparison
Grok Build 0.1 vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 35.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok Build 0.1 leads 31.3 to 24.8.
Side by side
| Grok Build 0.1 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 35.8 | 38.1 |
| Released | 2026-04-16 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 256K | — |
| Max output | 256K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2 | — |
| Results tracked | 3 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok Build 0.1 leads
Grok Build 0.1: 42.5 (#90), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 37.9 (#171)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 50.2% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1314 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: 22.5 (#122), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: —
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| GBAEval | 2.4% | — |
Reasoning Grok Build 0.1 leads
Grok Build 0.1: 31.3 (#73), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 24.8 (#139)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 9.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1299 |
Math Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 33.5 (#175)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1298 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 34.9 (#179)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1289 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 42.1 (#196)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1314 |
| LMArena German | — | 1231 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1207 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1271 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.4 (#194)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1275 |
Long Context Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#180)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1292 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.5 (#186)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1299 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok Build 0.1 better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 35.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Grok Build 0.1 or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?
Grok Build 0.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.5 versus 37.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Grok Build 0.1 and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok Build 0.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.