Model comparison
gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 36.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. gpt-oss-120b scores higher in 4 categories and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 4 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where gpt-oss-120b leads 50.6 to 33.5.
- gpt-oss-120b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| gpt-oss-120b | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 36.0 | 38.1 |
| Released | 2025-08-05 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 131K | — |
| Max output | 41K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.037 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.17 | — |
| Results tracked | 48 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
gpt-oss-120b: 33.2 (#251), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 37.9 (#171)
| Benchmark | gpt-oss-120b | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1380 | 1314 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 26% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 41.8% | — |
| SciCode | 36% | — |
| WeirdML | 48.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 575.62 | — |
| AlgoTune | 1.41 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
gpt-oss-120b: 12.1 (#145), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: —
| Benchmark | gpt-oss-120b | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 18.7% | — |
| APEX-Agents | 4.4% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 56.6% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | -21.53 | — |
Reasoning Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
gpt-oss-120b: 19.5 (#236), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 24.8 (#139)
| Benchmark | gpt-oss-120b | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1364 | 1299 |
| SimpleBench | 22.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 58.6% | — |
| CritPt | 1.1% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 20% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 2% | — |
| DTBench | 76.3% | — |
| LMCA | 22.1% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 25% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 139.94 | — |
Math gpt-oss-120b leads
gpt-oss-120b: 50.6 (#43), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 33.5 (#175)
| Benchmark | gpt-oss-120b | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1388 | 1298 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 88.9% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 68.8% | — |
Knowledge gpt-oss-120b leads
gpt-oss-120b: 42.3 (#89), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 34.9 (#179)
| Benchmark | gpt-oss-120b | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1356 | 1289 |
| GPQA Diamond | 75.8% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 79.5% | — |
| Confabulations | 15.7% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 14.2% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 68.4% | — |
Multilingual gpt-oss-120b leads
gpt-oss-120b: 48.2 (#142), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 42.1 (#196)
| Benchmark | gpt-oss-120b | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1350 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1384 | 1314 |
| LMArena German | 1355 | 1231 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1332 | 1207 |
| LMArena Russian | 1343 | 1271 |
| LMArena French | 1370 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1283 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1388 | — |
Instruction Following gpt-oss-120b leads
gpt-oss-120b: 69.5 (#168), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.4 (#194)
| Benchmark | gpt-oss-120b | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1318 | 1275 |
| IFEval | 83.6% | — |
Long Context Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
gpt-oss-120b: 31.4 (#273), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#180)
| Benchmark | gpt-oss-120b | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1319 | 1292 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 44.4% | — |
Writing & Preference Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
gpt-oss-120b: 46.7 (#213), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.5 (#186)
| Benchmark | gpt-oss-120b | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1366 | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1274 | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1340 | 1299 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 77.1% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 961 | — |
| WildBench | 84.5% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is gpt-oss-120b better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 36.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is gpt-oss-120b or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.9 versus 33.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do gpt-oss-120b and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. gpt-oss-120b has 48 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.