Model comparison

Mistral Medium vs Qwen3-30B-A3B

Qwen3-30B-A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.9 to 36.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 27 shared benchmarks.

Mistral Medium Mistral AI

36.3

Rank #218 Confirmed

Qwen3-30B-A3B Alibaba (Qwen)

38.9

Rank #179 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 27 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral Medium scores higher in 5 categories and Qwen3-30B-A3B in 4 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3-30B-A3B leads 41.8 to 25.0.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 32.2% for Mistral Medium and 70.3% for Qwen3-30B-A3B.
  • Qwen3-30B-A3B is cheaper at $0.12 / $0.50 per million input/output tokens, against $1.50 / $7.50 for Mistral Medium.
  • Mistral Medium accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 41K.

Side by side

Mistral Medium and Qwen3-30B-A3B specifications
Mistral MediumQwen3-30B-A3B
ProviderMistral AIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index36.338.9
Released2023-12-112025-04-28
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K41K
Max output262K16K
Input $ / M tokens$1.50$0.12
Output $ / M tokens$7.50$0.50
Results tracked3632

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3-30B-A3B leads

Mistral Medium: 34.2 (#243), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 37.5 (#194)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral MediumQwen3-30B-A3B
SciCode40.2%33.3%
WeirdML43.7%29.8%
LMArena Coding14341416
FrontierCode8%—
ALE-Bench763.98—

Agentic & Tool Use Qwen3-30B-A3B leads

Mistral Medium: 28.3 (#90), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 29.8 (#82)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral MediumQwen3-30B-A3B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard37.7%41.4%

Reasoning Mistral Medium leads

Mistral Medium: 24.0 (#167), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 22.2 (#204)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral MediumQwen3-30B-A3B
Kagi LLM Benchmark50%54.9%
CritPt0%0.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts14261398
DTBench75.5%69.3%
LMCA26.1%22.4%
Chess Puzzles—8%
Surface Evolver Bench26.9%—
Epoch Capabilities Index—139.63

Math Qwen3-30B-A3B leads

Mistral Medium: 28.1 (#245), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 37.4 (#157)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral MediumQwen3-30B-A3B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202532.2%70.3%
LMArena Math14081394
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—47.8%
ProofBench9%—
MATH Level 581.6%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)0.3%—

Knowledge Qwen3-30B-A3B leads

Mistral Medium: 25.0 (#265), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 41.8 (#105)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral MediumQwen3-30B-A3B
GPQA Diamond59.5%70.1%
LMArena Expert14081396
Humanity's Last Exam4.5%—
Confabulations—12.3%
Vectara Hallucination Rate22.7%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Mistral Medium: 35.3 (#88), Qwen3-30B-A3B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral MediumQwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Vision1172—

Multilingual Mistral Medium leads

Mistral Medium: 52.1 (#91), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 49.5 (#132)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral MediumQwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Non-English14081372
LMArena Chinese14471433
LMArena French14591418
LMArena German14321380
LMArena Japanese13781337
LMArena Korean13801331
LMArena Russian14111370
LMArena Spanish14331404

Instruction Following Mistral Medium leads

Mistral Medium: 73.7 (#116), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 72.0 (#142)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral MediumQwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Instruction Following13981363

Long Context Mistral Medium leads

Mistral Medium: 42.9 (#114), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 31.0 (#283)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral MediumQwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Longer Query14061379
Fiction.LiveBench—40.6%

Writing & Preference Mistral Medium leads

Mistral Medium: 60.0 (#103), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 55.6 (#143)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral MediumQwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Text14241384
LMArena Creative Writing13911317
Short-Story Creative Writing77.3%75.3%
LMArena Multi-Turn14181378

Frequently asked questions

Is Mistral Medium better than Qwen3-30B-A3B?

Qwen3-30B-A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.9 to 36.3 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Mistral Medium or Qwen3-30B-A3B?

Qwen3-30B-A3B is cheaper. It lists at $0.12 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; Mistral Medium lists at $1.50 and $7.50.

Is Mistral Medium or Qwen3-30B-A3B better for coding?

Qwen3-30B-A3B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.5 versus 34.2 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Mistral Medium does, with 262K tokens against 41K.

How many benchmarks do Mistral Medium and Qwen3-30B-A3B share?

27 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Medium has 36 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-30B-A3B has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper