Model comparison
Hy3 vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B
Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Hy3 leads 40.8 to 18.3.
Side by side
| Hy3 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 44.2 | 29.7 |
| Released | 2026-07-06 | 2024-12-31 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.0825 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.33 | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hy3 leads
Hy3: 46.8 (#63), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1508 | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 10.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1464 | — |
Reasoning Hy3 leads
Hy3: 26.1 (#136), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 41.2% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 16.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1447 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 20.6% |
| LiveBench | — | 22.1% |
Math Hy3 leads
Hy3: 40.1 (#93), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | — | 15.6% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 13.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1475 | — |
Knowledge Hy3 leads
Hy3: 40.8 (#114), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 31% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 31.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1460 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Hy3: 53.5 (#65), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Hy3 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1426 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1493 | — |
| LMArena French | 1461 | — |
| LMArena German | 1439 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1392 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1395 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1432 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1456 | — |
Instruction Following Hy3 leads
Hy3: 75.1 (#70), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 60.6% |
| IFEval | — | 73% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1426 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Hy3: 44.1 (#75), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Hy3 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1442 | — |
Writing & Preference Hy3 leads
Hy3: 62.2 (#81), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1439 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1402 | — |
| WildBench | — | 68.9% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1436 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 11.2% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hy3 better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?
Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hy3 or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?
Hy3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.8 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hy3 and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hy3 has 19 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.