Model comparison
MiMo-V2-Omni vs o1-pro
MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiMo-V2-Omni leads 40.5 to 29.7.
- MiMo-V2-Omni is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $150 / $600 for o1-pro.
- MiMo-V2-Omni accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 200K.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2-Omni | o1-pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 43.6 | 31.5 |
| Released | 2026-03-18 | 2025-03-19 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 262K | 200K |
| Max output | 131K | 100K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.14 | $150 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.28 | $600 |
| Results tracked | 18 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Omni: 43.3 (#89), o1-pro: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1466 | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 29.7 (#88), o1-pro: 20.4 (#239)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 23.3% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 6.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1445 | — |
Math Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.1 (#115), o1-pro: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1430 | — |
Knowledge MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 40.5 (#118), o1-pro: 29.7 (#234)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 8.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1449 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Omni: 38.6 (#63), o1-pro: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1228 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Omni: 51.8 (#102), o1-pro: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1404 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1465 | — |
| LMArena French | 1447 | — |
| LMArena German | 1399 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1317 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1355 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1412 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1434 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.2 (#66), o1-pro: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1428 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#76), o1-pro: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1442 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.4 (#87), o1-pro: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1423 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1392 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2-Omni better than o1-pro?
MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2-Omni or o1-pro?
MiMo-V2-Omni is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; o1-pro lists at $150 and $600.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2-Omni does, with 262K tokens against 200K.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Omni and o1-pro share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Omni has 18 scored results on Noometry and o1-pro has 3.