Noometry

Model comparison

Command R vs MiMo-V2-Omni

MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Command R Cohere

31.0

Rank #267 Confirmed

MiMo-V2-Omni Xiaomi

42.9

Rank #91 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2-Omni in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Omni leads 61.6 to 38.4.
  • MiMo-V2-Omni is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.15 / $0.60 for Command R.
  • MiMo-V2-Omni accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 128K.
  • Command R has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Command RMiMo-V2-Omni
ProviderCohereXiaomi
Noometry Index31.042.9
Released2024-08-302026-03-18
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window128K262K
Max output4K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.15$0.14
Output $ / M tokens$0.60$0.28
Results tracked2918

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Command R: 28.8 (#301), MiMo-V2-Omni: 42.7 (#87)

BenchmarkCommand RMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Coding11701467
BigCodeBench Instruct37.1%—
LiveBench Coding17.9%—
BigCodeBench Complete45.2%—

Reasoning MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Command R: 13.3 (#329), MiMo-V2-Omni: 28.6 (#86)

BenchmarkCommand RMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Hard Prompts11641445
LiveBench Reasoning21.9%—
DTBench46.4%—
LiveBench Data Analysis33.3%—
LMCA9.2%—
LiveBench27.5%—

Math MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Command R: 25.8 (#244), MiMo-V2-Omni: 36.4 (#112)

BenchmarkCommand RMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Math11551432
LiveBench Math19.4%—

Knowledge MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Command R: 30.5 (#219), MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.9 (#114)

BenchmarkCommand RMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Expert11381449
MMLU65.2%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Command R: —, MiMo-V2-Omni: 37.9 (#62)

BenchmarkCommand RMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Vision—1228

Multilingual MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Command R: 35.9 (#240), MiMo-V2-Omni: 52.0 (#97)

BenchmarkCommand RMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Non-English11741404
LMArena Chinese11821469
LMArena French11611448
LMArena German11761398
LMArena Japanese11431318
LMArena Korean11621355
LMArena Russian11741412
LMArena Spanish11501432

Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Command R: 58.3 (#256), MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.4 (#62)

BenchmarkCommand RMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Instruction Following11671428
LiveBench Instruction Following55.6%—

Long Context MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Command R: 36.3 (#226), MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#72)

BenchmarkCommand RMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Longer Query11981442

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Command R: 38.4 (#248), MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.6 (#83)

BenchmarkCommand RMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Text11871424
LMArena Creative Writing11701393
LMArena Multi-Turn11631446
LiveBench Language16.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Command R better than MiMo-V2-Omni?

MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Command R or MiMo-V2-Omni?

MiMo-V2-Omni is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Command R lists at $0.15 and $0.60.

Is Command R or MiMo-V2-Omni better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.7 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2-Omni does, with 262K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Command R and MiMo-V2-Omni share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Omni has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper