Model comparison

Grok 4.3 vs o1-pro

Grok 4.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4.3 xAI

43.6

Rank #80 Confirmed

o1-pro OpenAI

31.2

Rank #264 Reported

Summary

  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Grok 4.3 leads 52.5 to 29.3.
  • Grok 4.3 is cheaper at $1.25 / $2.50 per million input/output tokens, against $150 / $600 for o1-pro.
  • Grok 4.3 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 200K.

Side by side

Grok 4.3 and o1-pro specifications
Grok 4.3o1-pro
ProviderxAIOpenAI
Noometry Index43.631.2
Released2026-04-172025-03-19
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M200K
Max output30K100K
Input $ / M tokens$1.25$150
Output $ / M tokens$2.50$600
Results tracked403

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Grok 4.3: 41.3 (#117), o1-pro: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3o1-pro
LMArena WebDev1357—
SciCode47.3%—
WeirdML49.9%—
LMArena Coding1415—
ALE-Bench944.17—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 4.3: 27.6 (#93), o1-pro: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3o1-pro
GDP.pdf8%—
LMArena Search1165—
Vending-Bench 235.26—

Reasoning Grok 4.3 leads

Grok 4.3: 34.9 (#60), o1-pro: 20.2 (#223)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3o1-pro
NYT Connections (extended)55.2%—
ARC-AGI-1—23.3%
CritPt8%—
Chess Puzzles25%—
EnigmaEval—6.1%
LMArena Hard Prompts1397—
DTBench90.7%—
LMCA38.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index149.13—
ForecastBench60.3—

Math Not comparable

Grok 4.3: 45.8 (#60), o1-pro: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3o1-pro
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)42.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 414.6%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202593.3%—
ProofBench11%—
LMArena Math1388—

Knowledge Grok 4.3 leads

Grok 4.3: 52.5 (#57), o1-pro: 29.3 (#227)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3o1-pro
GPQA Diamond88.8%—
Humanity's Last Exam—8.1%
SimpleQA Verified33.2%—
LMArena Expert1385—

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok 4.3: 31.6 (#96), o1-pro: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3o1-pro
LMArena Vision1231—
Blueprint-Bench 20%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Grok 4.3: 50.7 (#114), o1-pro: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3o1-pro
LMArena Non-English1385—
LMArena Chinese1423—
LMArena French1412—
LMArena German1395—
LMArena Japanese1379—
LMArena Korean1357—
LMArena Russian1399—
LMArena Spanish1402—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Grok 4.3: 72.3 (#135), o1-pro: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3o1-pro
LMArena Instruction Following1366—

Long Context Not comparable

Grok 4.3: 42.5 (#118), o1-pro: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3o1-pro
LMArena Longer Query1393—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Grok 4.3: 58.6 (#112), o1-pro: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3o1-pro
LMArena Text1397—
LMArena Creative Writing1380—
EQ-Bench 41075—
LMArena Multi-Turn1406—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4.3 better than o1-pro?

Grok 4.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.3 or o1-pro?

Grok 4.3 is cheaper. It lists at $1.25 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; o1-pro lists at $150 and $600.

Which has the bigger context window?

Grok 4.3 does, with 1M tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4.3 and o1-pro share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.3 has 40 scored results on Noometry and o1-pro has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper