Model comparison

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct vs MiMo-V2-Omni

MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 31.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct IBM

31.1

Rank #266 Confirmed

MiMo-V2-Omni Xiaomi

42.9

Rank #91 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.0 8b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2-Omni in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Omni leads 61.6 to 31.2.
  • Granite 3.0 8b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct and MiMo-V2-Omni specifications
Granite 3.0 8b InstructMiMo-V2-Omni
ProviderIBMXiaomi
Noometry Index31.142.9
Released—2026-03-18
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—262K
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.14
Output $ / M tokens—$0.28
Results tracked1418

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.1 (#297), MiMo-V2-Omni: 42.7 (#87)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Coding11131467
BigCodeBench Instruct29.3%—
BigCodeBench Complete35.4%—

Reasoning MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 20.0 (#227), MiMo-V2-Omni: 28.6 (#86)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Hard Prompts10921445

Math MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 30.3 (#211), MiMo-V2-Omni: 36.4 (#112)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Math11431432

Knowledge MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.1 (#233), MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.9 (#114)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Expert10871449

Multimodal Not comparable

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: —, MiMo-V2-Omni: 37.9 (#62)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Vision—1228

Multilingual MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 27.4 (#271), MiMo-V2-Omni: 52.0 (#97)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Non-English10371404
LMArena Chinese10631469
LMArena Russian10601412
LMArena French—1448
LMArena German—1398
LMArena Japanese—1318
LMArena Korean—1355
LMArena Spanish—1432

Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 56.2 (#271), MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.4 (#62)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Instruction Following10881428

Long Context MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 34.0 (#247), MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#72)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Longer Query11221442

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 31.2 (#280), MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.6 (#83)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Text10961424
LMArena Creative Writing10711393
LMArena Multi-Turn10631446

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 3.0 8b Instruct better than MiMo-V2-Omni?

MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 31.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 3.0 8b Instruct or MiMo-V2-Omni better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.7 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 3.0 8b Instruct and MiMo-V2-Omni share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.0 8b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Omni has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper