Model comparison
MiMo-V2-Omni vs MiMo-V2-Pro
MiMo-V2-Omni and MiMo-V2-Pro score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.6 vs 43.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher in 2 categories and MiMo-V2-Pro in 6 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2-Omni leads 29.7 to 22.1.
- MiMo-V2-Omni is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.43 / $0.87 for MiMo-V2-Pro.
- MiMo-V2-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2-Omni | MiMo-V2-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 43.6 | 43.0 |
| Released | 2026-03-18 | 2026-03-18 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 262K | 1.05M |
| Max output | 131K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.14 | $0.43 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.28 | $0.87 |
| Results tracked | 18 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
MiMo-V2-Omni: 43.3 (#89), MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.8 (#83)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1466 | 1476 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1433 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 785.17 |
Reasoning MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 29.7 (#88), MiMo-V2-Pro: 22.1 (#206)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1445 | 1457 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 25.8% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 45.9% |
Math Too close to call
MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.1 (#115), MiMo-V2-Pro: 39.5 (#102)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1430 | 1447 |
Knowledge Too close to call
MiMo-V2-Omni: 40.5 (#118), MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.4 (#111)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1449 | 1478 |
Multimodal Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Omni: 38.6 (#63), MiMo-V2-Pro: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1228 | — |
Multilingual Too close to call
MiMo-V2-Omni: 51.8 (#102), MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.7 (#81)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1404 | 1416 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1465 | 1456 |
| LMArena French | 1447 | 1469 |
| LMArena German | 1399 | 1417 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1317 | 1366 |
| LMArena Korean | 1355 | 1400 |
| LMArena Russian | 1412 | 1427 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1434 | 1457 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.2 (#66), MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.0 (#49)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1428 | 1445 |
Long Context MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#76), MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#138)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1442 | 1455 |
| CL-bench | — | 15.7% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 6.9% |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Pro leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.4 (#87), MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.8 (#70)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1423 | 1436 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1392 | 1415 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | 1456 |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2-Omni better than MiMo-V2-Pro?
MiMo-V2-Omni and MiMo-V2-Pro score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.6 vs 43.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2-Omni or MiMo-V2-Pro?
MiMo-V2-Omni is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2-Pro lists at $0.43 and $0.87.
Is MiMo-V2-Omni or MiMo-V2-Pro better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (43.3 vs 43.8); test both on your own repository before choosing.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Omni and MiMo-V2-Pro share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Omni has 18 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Pro has 23.