Model comparison
MiMo-V2-Omni vs Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
MiMo-V2-Omni and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.6 vs 43.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher in 5 categories and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct in 3 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where MiMo-V2-Omni leads 44.1 to 37.0.
- MiMo-V2-Omni is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.50 / $2 for Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct.
- MiMo-V2-Omni accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 131K.
- Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 43.6 | 43.0 |
| Released | 2026-03-18 | 2025-09 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 262K | 131K |
| Max output | 131K | 33K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.14 | $0.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.28 | $2 |
| Results tracked | 18 | 25 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
MiMo-V2-Omni: 43.3 (#89), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 42.5 (#98)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1466 | 1440 |
Reasoning Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 29.7 (#88), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 31.1 (#81)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1445 | 1428 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 66.7% |
Math Too close to call
MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.1 (#115), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 38.8 (#126)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1430 | 1440 |
| Omni-MATH | — | 46.7% |
Knowledge Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 40.5 (#118), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 41.8 (#106)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1449 | 1417 |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 78.6% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 9.3% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 63% |
Multimodal Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Omni: 38.6 (#63), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1228 | — |
Multilingual Too close to call
MiMo-V2-Omni: 51.8 (#102), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 52.1 (#93)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1404 | 1407 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1465 | 1460 |
| LMArena French | 1447 | 1413 |
| LMArena German | 1399 | 1417 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1317 | 1395 |
| LMArena Korean | 1355 | 1364 |
| LMArena Russian | 1412 | 1404 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1434 | 1435 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.2 (#66), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 70.8 (#159)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1428 | 1389 |
| IFEval | — | 81% |
Long Context MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#76), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 37.0 (#223)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1442 | 1403 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 55.6% |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.4 (#87), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 58.0 (#121)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1423 | 1417 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1392 | 1334 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | 1416 |
| WildBench | — | 80.7% |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2-Omni better than Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct?
MiMo-V2-Omni and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.6 vs 43.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2-Omni or Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct?
MiMo-V2-Omni is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct lists at $0.50 and $2.
Is MiMo-V2-Omni or Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (43.3 vs 42.5); test both on your own repository before choosing.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2-Omni does, with 262K tokens against 131K.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Omni and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Omni has 18 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct has 25.