Noometry

Model comparison

MiMo-V2-Pro vs Qwen3 Max

MiMo-V2-Pro and Qwen3 Max score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.0 vs 43.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.

MiMo-V2-Pro Xiaomi

43.0

Rank #103 Confirmed

Qwen3 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

43.7

Rank #87 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher in 4 categories and Qwen3 Max in 4 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3 Max leads 48.1 to 41.4.
  • MiMo-V2-Pro is cheaper at $0.43 / $0.87 per million input/output tokens, against $1.20 / $6 for Qwen3 Max.
  • MiMo-V2-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.

Side by side

MiMo-V2-ProQwen3 Max
ProviderXiaomiAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index43.043.7
Released2026-03-182025-09-23
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M262K
Max output131K66K
Input $ / M tokens$0.43$1.20
Output $ / M tokens$0.87$6
Results tracked2333

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.8 (#83), Qwen3 Max: 43.0 (#93)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProQwen3 Max
LMArena Coding14761456
ALE-Bench785.17370.45
LMArena WebDev1433—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

MiMo-V2-Pro: —, Qwen3 Max: —

BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProQwen3 Max
Vending-Bench 2—71.56

Reasoning Too close to call

MiMo-V2-Pro: 22.1 (#206), Qwen3 Max: 22.6 (#190)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProQwen3 Max
NYT Connections (extended)25.8%30.1%
LMArena Hard Prompts14571448
Kagi LLM Benchmark—72.5%
Chess Puzzles—4%
Thematic Generalization45.9%—
Mystery Game Puzzles—5%
DTBench—82.1%
LMCA—28.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—142.38

Math Too close to call

MiMo-V2-Pro: 39.5 (#102), Qwen3 Max: 38.7 (#131)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProQwen3 Max
LMArena Math14471446
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—18.9%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—73.3%
MATH Level 5—97.1%

Knowledge Qwen3 Max leads

MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.4 (#111), Qwen3 Max: 48.1 (#78)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProQwen3 Max
LMArena Expert14781455
GPQA Diamond—72.6%
SimpleQA Verified—48.7%

Multilingual Too close to call

MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.7 (#81), Qwen3 Max: 53.7 (#62)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProQwen3 Max
LMArena Non-English14161429
LMArena Chinese14561478
LMArena French14691449
LMArena German14171463
LMArena Japanese13661397
LMArena Korean14001399
LMArena Russian14271428
LMArena Spanish14571462

Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Pro leads

MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.0 (#49), Qwen3 Max: 74.8 (#87)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProQwen3 Max
LMArena Instruction Following14451419

Long Context Too close to call

MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#138), Qwen3 Max: 41.6 (#134)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProQwen3 Max
CL-bench15.7%14.5%
LMArena Longer Query14551438
Fiction.LiveBench—66.7%
CL-bench Life6.9%—

Writing & Preference Too close to call

MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.8 (#70), Qwen3 Max: 62.4 (#76)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProQwen3 Max
LMArena Text14361439
LMArena Creative Writing14151402
LMArena Multi-Turn14561446

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2-Pro better than Qwen3 Max?

MiMo-V2-Pro and Qwen3 Max score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.0 vs 43.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2-Pro or Qwen3 Max?

MiMo-V2-Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.43 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens; Qwen3 Max lists at $1.20 and $6.

Is MiMo-V2-Pro or Qwen3 Max better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (43.8 vs 43.0); test both on your own repository before choosing.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Pro and Qwen3 Max share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Pro has 23 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Max has 33.

Related comparisons

Go deeper