Model comparison
Kimi K2.5 Instant vs MiMo-V2-Pro
Kimi K2.5 Instant and MiMo-V2-Pro score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.6 vs 43.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2.5 Instant scores higher in 2 categories and MiMo-V2-Pro in 6 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Kimi K2.5 Instant leads 29.7 to 22.1.
- Kimi K2.5 Instant has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Kimi K2.5 Instant | MiMo-V2-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 43.6 | 43.0 |
| Released | — | 2026-03-18 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.43 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.87 |
| Results tracked | 18 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 42.6 (#97), MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.8 (#83)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1404 | 1433 |
| LMArena Coding | 1484 | 1476 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 785.17 |
Reasoning Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 29.7 (#90), MiMo-V2-Pro: 22.1 (#206)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1443 | 1457 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 25.8% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 45.9% |
Math Too close to call
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 39.4 (#105), MiMo-V2-Pro: 39.5 (#102)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1442 | 1447 |
Knowledge MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 40.2 (#123), MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.4 (#111)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1440 | 1478 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 40.2 (#50), MiMo-V2-Pro: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1254 | — |
Multilingual Too close to call
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 52.0 (#94), MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.7 (#81)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1406 | 1416 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1449 | 1456 |
| LMArena French | 1403 | 1469 |
| LMArena German | 1413 | 1417 |
| LMArena Korean | 1378 | 1400 |
| LMArena Russian | 1404 | 1427 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1447 | 1457 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1366 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 75.3 (#65), MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.0 (#49)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1430 | 1445 |
Long Context Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 43.9 (#83), MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#138)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1435 | 1455 |
| CL-bench | — | 15.7% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 6.9% |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 60.6 (#95), MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.8 (#70)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1420 | 1436 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1381 | 1415 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1427 | 1456 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Kimi K2.5 Instant better than MiMo-V2-Pro?
Kimi K2.5 Instant and MiMo-V2-Pro score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.6 vs 43.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Kimi K2.5 Instant or MiMo-V2-Pro better for coding?
MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.8 versus 42.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.5 Instant and MiMo-V2-Pro share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2.5 Instant has 18 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Pro has 23.