Model comparison
MiMo-V2-Flash vs o1-pro
MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiMo-V2-Flash leads 39.7 to 29.7.
- MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $150 / $600 for o1-pro.
- MiMo-V2-Flash accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 200K.
- MiMo-V2-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2-Flash | o1-pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 31.5 |
| Released | 2025-12-16 | 2025-03-19 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 262K | 200K |
| Max output | 66K | 100K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.14 | $150 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.28 | $600 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211), o1-pro: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1330 | — |
| SciCode | 25.9% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1443 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 737.95 | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2-Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157), o1-pro: 20.4 (#239)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 23.3% |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| EnigmaEval | — | 6.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1420 | — |
Math Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139), o1-pro: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1396 | — |
Knowledge MiMo-V2-Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131), o1-pro: 29.7 (#234)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 8.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1425 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113), o1-pro: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1392 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1462 | — |
| LMArena French | 1429 | — |
| LMArena German | 1395 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1325 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1358 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1387 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1420 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120), o1-pro: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1392 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110), o1-pro: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1409 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106), o1-pro: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1411 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1375 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1404 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2-Flash better than o1-pro?
MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2-Flash or o1-pro?
MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; o1-pro lists at $150 and $600.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2-Flash does, with 262K tokens against 200K.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Flash and o1-pro share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and o1-pro has 3.