Model comparison
GLM-4.6V vs o1-pro
GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where GLM-4.6V leads 38.0 to 29.7.
- GLM-4.6V is cheaper at $0.30 / $0.90 per million input/output tokens, against $150 / $600 for o1-pro.
- o1-pro accepts more context: 200K tokens versus 128K.
- GLM-4.6V has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GLM-4.6V | o1-pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 31.5 |
| Released | 2025-12-08 | 2025-03-19 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 128K | 200K |
| Max output | 33K | 100K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | $150 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.90 | $600 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
GLM-4.6V: 40.9 (#128), o1-pro: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1390 | — |
Reasoning GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 27.6 (#115), o1-pro: 20.4 (#239)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 23.3% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 6.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1368 | — |
Knowledge GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 38.0 (#149), o1-pro: 29.7 (#234)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 8.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1371 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
GLM-4.6V: 34.8 (#90), o1-pro: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1164 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
GLM-4.6V: 48.6 (#141), o1-pro: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1359 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1425 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1340 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GLM-4.6V: 71.4 (#151), o1-pro: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1352 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
GLM-4.6V: 41.3 (#143), o1-pro: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1358 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GLM-4.6V: 56.6 (#137), o1-pro: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1377 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1347 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1360 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-4.6V better than o1-pro?
GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, GLM-4.6V or o1-pro?
GLM-4.6V is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $0.90 per million output tokens; o1-pro lists at $150 and $600.
Which has the bigger context window?
o1-pro does, with 200K tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do GLM-4.6V and o1-pro share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.6V has 12 scored results on Noometry and o1-pro has 3.