Model comparison
MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Qwen3.5 Max Preview
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.7 to 44.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen3.5 Max Preview in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 53.2 to 43.4.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 46.7 | 44.7 |
| Released | 2026-09-22 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.43 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.87 | — |
| Results tracked | 14 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 53.2 (#27), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 43.4 (#79)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1538 | 1488 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1618 | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 30.4 (#76), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 29.6 (#81)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1511 | 1483 |
Math Too close to call
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.9 (#91), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 37.3 (#99)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1497 | 1473 |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.0 (#85), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 41.1 (#104)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1548 | 1489 |
Multimodal Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.2 (#40), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1265 | — |
Multilingual Too close to call
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 57.0 (#15), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 56.4 (#21)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1474 | 1465 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1532 | 1534 |
| LMArena Russian | 1481 | 1472 |
| LMArena French | — | 1483 |
| LMArena German | — | 1487 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1497 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1438 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1470 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#10), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 77.2 (#28)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1490 | 1467 |
Long Context Too close to call
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#26), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 45.2 (#44)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1500 | 1477 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.9 (#32), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 66.1 (#39)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1491 | 1471 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1465 | 1464 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1463 | 1478 |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro better than Qwen3.5 Max Preview?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.7 to 44.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro or Qwen3.5 Max Preview better for coding?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.2 versus 43.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Qwen3.5 Max Preview share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Max Preview has 17.