Model comparison
Grok 4.7 vs Qwen3.5 Max Preview
Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 44.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.7 scores higher in 4 categories and Qwen3.5 Max Preview in 4 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Grok 4.7 leads 55.0 to 43.4.
Side by side
| Grok 4.7 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 46.6 | 44.7 |
| Released | 2026-09-21 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 500K | — |
| Max output | 500K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $6 | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.7: 55.0 (#23), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 43.4 (#79)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1423 | 1488 |
| CursorBench | 46.3% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1636 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 29.5% | — |
| SciCode | 57.4% | — |
Reasoning Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.7: 40.1 (#49), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 29.6 (#81)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1409 | 1483 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 76.8% | — |
| CritPt | 17.7% | — |
Math Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.7: 41.1 (#73), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 37.3 (#99)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1393 | 1473 |
| ProofBench | 34% | — |
Knowledge Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
Grok 4.7: 38.7 (#130), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 41.1 (#104)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1413 | 1489 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Grok 4.7: 28.8 (#107), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | 20.8% | — |
Multilingual Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
Grok 4.7: 51.2 (#108), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 56.4 (#21)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1392 | 1465 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1476 | 1534 |
| LMArena Russian | 1396 | 1472 |
| LMArena French | — | 1483 |
| LMArena German | — | 1487 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1497 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1438 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1470 |
Instruction Following Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
Grok 4.7: 74.3 (#98), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 77.2 (#28)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1406 | 1467 |
Long Context Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
Grok 4.7: 43.2 (#97), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 45.2 (#44)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1416 | 1477 |
Writing & Preference Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.7: 70.1 (#23), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 66.1 (#39)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1397 | 1471 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1391 | 1464 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1389 | 1478 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 2007 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 4.7 better than Qwen3.5 Max Preview?
Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 44.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Grok 4.7 or Qwen3.5 Max Preview better for coding?
Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.0 versus 43.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Grok 4.7 and Qwen3.5 Max Preview share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.7 has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Max Preview has 17.