Model comparison

Hy4 preview vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 45.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Hy4 preview Tencent

45.3

Rank #73 Reported

MiMo-V2.6-Pro Xiaomi

50.3

Rank #49 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Hy4 preview scores higher in 1 category and MiMo-V2.6-Pro in 2 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 43.1 to 31.9.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is ProofBench: 75% for Hy4 preview and 70% for MiMo-V2.6-Pro.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper at $0.43 / $0.87 per million input/output tokens, against $0.75 / $2.25 for Hy4 preview.

Side by side

Hy4 preview and MiMo-V2.6-Pro specifications
Hy4 previewMiMo-V2.6-Pro
ProviderTencentXiaomi
Noometry Index45.350.3
Released2026-08-282026-09-21
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1.05M1.05M
Max output64K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.75$0.43
Output $ / M tokens$2.25$0.87
Results tracked319

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Hy4 preview: 51.6 (#38), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena WebDev16321629
SciCode—60.9%
LMArena Coding—1534
ALE-Bench—1,158

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hy4 preview: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewMiMo-V2.6-Pro
APEX-Agents—59.5%

Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Hy4 preview: 31.9 (#79), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewMiMo-V2.6-Pro
NYT Connections (extended)68.2%—
CritPt—26.6%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1512

Math Hy4 preview leads

Hy4 preview: 55.7 (#42), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewMiMo-V2.6-Pro
ProofBench75%70%
LMArena Math—1494

Knowledge Not comparable

Hy4 preview: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Expert—1543

Multimodal Not comparable

Hy4 preview: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Vision—1264

Multilingual Not comparable

Hy4 preview: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Non-English—1474
LMArena Chinese—1529
LMArena Russian—1480

Instruction Following Not comparable

Hy4 preview: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Instruction Following—1493

Long Context Not comparable

Hy4 preview: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Longer Query—1501

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Hy4 preview: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Text—1492
LMArena Creative Writing—1468
LMArena Multi-Turn—1464

Frequently asked questions

Is Hy4 preview better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 45.3 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Hy4 preview or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.43 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens; Hy4 preview lists at $0.75 and $2.25.

Is Hy4 preview or MiMo-V2.6-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 51.6 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 1.05M tokens.

How many benchmarks do Hy4 preview and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hy4 preview has 3 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper