Model comparison

MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Pixtral Large

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro Xiaomi

50.3

Rank #49 Confirmed

Pixtral Large Mistral AI

32.2

Rank #259 Reported

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher in 3 categories and Pixtral Large in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 66.8 to 32.9.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper at $0.43 / $0.87 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $6 for Pixtral Large.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.

Side by side

MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Pixtral Large specifications
MiMo-V2.6-ProPixtral Large
ProviderXiaomiMistral AI
Noometry Index50.332.2
Released2026-09-212024-11-01
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1.05M128K
Max output131K128K
Input $ / M tokens$0.43$2
Output $ / M tokens$0.87$6
Results tracked193

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23), Pixtral Large: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProPixtral Large
LMArena WebDev1629—
SciCode60.9%—
LMArena Coding1534—
ALE-Bench1,158—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35), Pixtral Large: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProPixtral Large
APEX-Agents59.5%—

Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50), Pixtral Large: 21.7 (#218)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProPixtral Large
CritPt26.6%—
EnigmaEval—0.8%
LMArena Hard Prompts1512—

Math Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45), Pixtral Large: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProPixtral Large
ProofBench70%—
LMArena Math1494—

Knowledge Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92), Pixtral Large: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProPixtral Large
LMArena Expert1543—

Multimodal MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43), Pixtral Large: 30.6 (#111)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProPixtral Large
LMArena Vision12641089

Multilingual Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14), Pixtral Large: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProPixtral Large
LMArena Non-English1474—
LMArena Chinese1529—
LMArena Russian1480—

Instruction Following Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12), Pixtral Large: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProPixtral Large
LMArena Instruction Following1493—

Long Context Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27), Pixtral Large: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProPixtral Large
LMArena Longer Query1501—

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33), Pixtral Large: 32.9 (#278)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProPixtral Large
LMArena Text1492—
LMArena Creative Writing1468—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—988
LMArena Multi-Turn1464—

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro better than Pixtral Large?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Pro or Pixtral Large?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.43 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens; Pixtral Large lists at $2 and $6.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Pixtral Large share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19 scored results on Noometry and Pixtral Large has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper