Model comparison
Falcon-180B vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.
Technology Innovation InstituteSummary
- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Pro in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 66.8 to 29.1.
Side by side
| Falcon-180B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 32.2 | 50.3 |
| Released | 2023-09-06 | 2026-09-21 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.43 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.87 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1629 |
| SciCode | — | 60.9% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1534 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,158 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 59.5% |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1007 | 1512 |
| CritPt | — | 26.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 112.13 | — |
| HellaSwag | 89% | — |
| LAMBADA | 79.8% | — |
| PIQA | 84.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.1% | — |
Math Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | — | 70% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1494 |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1543 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 67.8% | — |
| BoolQ | 89% | — |
| MMLU | 70.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 64.2% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1264 |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | 1474 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1529 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1480 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1047 | 1493 |
Long Context Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1501 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1054 | 1492 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1089 | 1468 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1013 | 1464 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Falcon-180B better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?
6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19.