Noometry

Model comparison

Command R+ vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Command R+ Cohere

32.4

Rank #257 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.6-Pro Xiaomi

50.3

Rank #49 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Pro in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 43.1 to 9.2.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper at $0.43 / $0.87 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command R+.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.

Side by side

Command R+MiMo-V2.6-Pro
ProviderCohereXiaomi
Noometry Index32.450.3
Released2024-08-302026-09-21
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K1.05M
Max output4K131K
Input $ / M tokens$2.50$0.43
Output $ / M tokens$10$0.87
Results tracked3419

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Command R+: 29.1 (#309), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23)

BenchmarkCommand R+MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Coding11871534
LMArena WebDev—1629
SciCode—60.9%
BigCodeBench Instruct33.8%—
LiveBench Coding19.1%—
BigCodeBench Complete41.9%—
ALE-Bench—1,158
HumanEval+56.7%—
MBPP+63.5%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Command R+: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35)

BenchmarkCommand R+MiMo-V2.6-Pro
APEX-Agents—59.5%

Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Command R+: 9.2 (#344), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50)

BenchmarkCommand R+MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Hard Prompts11861512
SimpleBench17.4%—
CritPt—26.6%
LiveBench Reasoning24.8%—
DTBench54.9%—
LiveBench Data Analysis38.1%—
LMCA5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index119.34—
LiveBench31.8%—

Math MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Command R+: 28.9 (#242), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45)

BenchmarkCommand R+MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Math11881494
ProofBench—70%
LiveBench Math21.3%—

Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Command R+: 36.4 (#169), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92)

BenchmarkCommand R+MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Expert11741543
Vectara Hallucination Rate6.9%—
MMLU69.4%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Command R+: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43)

BenchmarkCommand R+MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Vision—1264

Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Command R+: 38.6 (#227), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14)

BenchmarkCommand R+MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Non-English12161474
LMArena Chinese12261529
LMArena Russian12271480
LMArena French1209—
LMArena German1216—
LMArena Japanese1166—
LMArena Korean1138—
LMArena Spanish1189—

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Command R+: 60.0 (#254), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12)

BenchmarkCommand R+MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Instruction Following11971493
LiveBench Instruction Following57.6%—

Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Command R+: 37.3 (#219), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27)

BenchmarkCommand R+MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Longer Query12301501

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Command R+: 43.5 (#228), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33)

BenchmarkCommand R+MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Text12291492
LMArena Creative Writing12351468
LMArena Multi-Turn12131464
LiveBench Language29.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Command R+ better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Command R+ or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.43 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens; Command R+ lists at $2.50 and $10.

Is Command R+ or MiMo-V2.6-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Command R+ and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper