Noometry

Model comparison

MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Nemotron 3 Super

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.7 to 39.6 on the Noometry Index. Nemotron 3 Super costs 3.2× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2.6-Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro Xiaomi

46.7

Rank #55 Confirmed

Nemotron 3 Super NVIDIA

39.6

Rank #147 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher in 8 categories and Nemotron 3 Super in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 53.2 to 38.9.
  • Nemotron 3 Super is cheaper at $0.08 / $0.45 per million input/output tokens, against $0.43 / $0.87 for MiMo-V2.6-Pro.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.

Side by side

MiMo-V2.6-ProNemotron 3 Super
ProviderXiaomiNVIDIA
Noometry Index46.739.6
Released2026-09-222026-03-11
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1.05M262K
Max output131K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.43$0.08
Output $ / M tokens$0.87$0.45
Results tracked1421

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 53.2 (#27), Nemotron 3 Super: 38.9 (#153)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProNemotron 3 Super
LMArena Coding15381403
LMArena WebDev1618—
SciCode—36%
WeirdML—38%
ALE-Bench—213.9

Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 30.4 (#76), Nemotron 3 Super: 17.9 (#274)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProNemotron 3 Super
LMArena Hard Prompts15111386
NYT Connections (extended)—15.4%
CritPt—3.1%

Math Too close to call

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.9 (#91), Nemotron 3 Super: 37.6 (#95)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProNemotron 3 Super
LMArena Math14971381
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—60.4%

Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.0 (#85), Nemotron 3 Super: 38.2 (#136)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProNemotron 3 Super
LMArena Expert15481397

Multimodal Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.2 (#40), Nemotron 3 Super: —

BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProNemotron 3 Super
LMArena Vision1265—

Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 57.0 (#15), Nemotron 3 Super: 48.6 (#139)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProNemotron 3 Super
LMArena Non-English14741356
LMArena Chinese15321430
LMArena Russian14811336
LMArena French—1404
LMArena German—1341
LMArena Spanish—1417

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#10), Nemotron 3 Super: 71.4 (#149)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProNemotron 3 Super
LMArena Instruction Following14901347

Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#26), Nemotron 3 Super: 41.5 (#134)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProNemotron 3 Super
LMArena Longer Query15001362

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.9 (#32), Nemotron 3 Super: 56.1 (#135)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProNemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text14911378
LMArena Creative Writing14651317
LMArena Multi-Turn14631369

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro better than Nemotron 3 Super?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.7 to 39.6 on the Noometry Index. Nemotron 3 Super costs 3.2× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2.6-Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Pro or Nemotron 3 Super?

Nemotron 3 Super is cheaper. It lists at $0.08 per million input tokens and $0.45 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.6-Pro lists at $0.43 and $0.87.

Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro or Nemotron 3 Super better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.2 versus 38.9 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Nemotron 3 Super share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 3 Super has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper