Model comparison
MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs MiniMax M1
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 40.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
MiniMaxSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher in 8 categories and MiniMax M1 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 54.5 to 37.5.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper at $0.43 / $0.87 per million input/output tokens, against $0.55 / $2.20 for MiniMax M1.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2.6-Pro | MiniMax M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 50.3 | 40.3 |
| Released | 2026-09-21 | 2025-06-13 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1M |
| Max output | 131K | 40K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.43 | $0.55 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.87 | $2.20 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23), MiniMax M1: 39.9 (#153)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1534 | 1359 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1629 | — |
| SciCode | 60.9% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,158 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35), MiniMax M1: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 59.5% | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50), MiniMax M1: 26.9 (#126)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1512 | 1339 |
| CritPt | 26.6% | — |
Math MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45), MiniMax M1: 37.5 (#151)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1494 | 1361 |
| ProofBench | 70% | — |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92), MiniMax M1: 36.4 (#170)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1543 | 1317 |
Multimodal Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43), MiniMax M1: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1264 | — |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14), MiniMax M1: 45.8 (#163)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1474 | 1319 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1529 | 1360 |
| LMArena Russian | 1480 | 1329 |
| LMArena French | — | 1370 |
| LMArena German | — | 1350 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1217 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1266 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1353 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12), MiniMax M1: 69.3 (#174)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1493 | 1312 |
Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27), MiniMax M1: 41.4 (#141)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1501 | 1326 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 69.4% |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33), MiniMax M1: 53.1 (#161)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1492 | 1343 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1468 | 1298 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1464 | 1335 |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro better than MiniMax M1?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 40.3 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Pro or MiniMax M1?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.43 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens; MiniMax M1 lists at $0.55 and $2.20.
Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro or MiniMax M1 better for coding?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 39.9 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Pro and MiniMax M1 share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax M1 has 18.