Model comparison
Grok 4.7 vs Nemotron 3 Super
Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.1 to 40.1 on the Noometry Index. Nemotron 3 Super costs 17× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok 4.7's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIASummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.7 scores higher in 8 categories and Nemotron 3 Super in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.7 leads 49.1 to 18.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 76.8% for Grok 4.7 and 15.4% for Nemotron 3 Super.
- Nemotron 3 Super is cheaper at $0.08 / $0.45 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $6 for Grok 4.7.
- Grok 4.7 accepts more context: 500K tokens versus 262K.
- Nemotron 3 Super has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Grok 4.7 | Nemotron 3 Super | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | NVIDIA |
| Noometry Index | 53.1 | 40.1 |
| Released | 2026-09-21 | 2026-03-11 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 500K | 262K |
| Max output | 500K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2 | $0.08 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $6 | $0.45 |
| Results tracked | 39 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.7: 58.0 (#18), Nemotron 3 Super: 39.4 (#158)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 57.8% | 36% |
| LMArena Coding | 1427 | 1403 |
| FrontierCode | 47.6% | — |
| CursorBench | 46.3% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1639 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 29.5% | — |
| WeirdML | — | 38% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 213.9 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Grok 4.7: 36.7 (#37), Nemotron 3 Super: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 54.6% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 22.8% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 10,537 | — |
Reasoning Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.7: 49.1 (#40), Nemotron 3 Super: 18.7 (#276)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 76.8% | 15.4% |
| CritPt | 18% | 3.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1413 | 1386 |
| Chess Puzzles | 38% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 29% | — |
| DTBench | 96% | — |
| LMCA | 49.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 153.53 | — |
Math Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.7: 57.8 (#39), Nemotron 3 Super: 39.6 (#101)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1407 | 1380 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 53% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 17.1% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 60.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 98.1% | — |
| ProofBench | 34% | — |
Knowledge Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.7: 62.8 (#22), Nemotron 3 Super: 38.9 (#139)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1422 | 1398 |
| GPQA Diamond | 92.7% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 56% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Grok 4.7: 35.5 (#87), Nemotron 3 Super: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1228 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 32.5% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 20.8% | — |
Multilingual Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.7: 50.8 (#116), Nemotron 3 Super: 48.4 (#144)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1389 | 1355 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1455 | 1432 |
| LMArena French | 1455 | 1405 |
| LMArena Russian | 1397 | 1336 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1400 | 1417 |
| LMArena German | — | 1341 |
Instruction Following Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.7: 74.1 (#105), Nemotron 3 Super: 71.2 (#154)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1404 | 1347 |
Long Context Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.7: 43.1 (#104), Nemotron 3 Super: 41.5 (#139)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1413 | 1362 |
Writing & Preference Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.7: 70.0 (#24), Nemotron 3 Super: 55.9 (#140)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1399 | 1378 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1391 | 1317 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1393 | 1369 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 2007 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 4.7 better than Nemotron 3 Super?
Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.1 to 40.1 on the Noometry Index. Nemotron 3 Super costs 17× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok 4.7's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Grok 4.7 or Nemotron 3 Super?
Nemotron 3 Super is cheaper. It lists at $0.08 per million input tokens and $0.45 per million output tokens; Grok 4.7 lists at $2 and $6.
Is Grok 4.7 or Nemotron 3 Super better for coding?
Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 58.0 versus 39.4 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Grok 4.7 does, with 500K tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks do Grok 4.7 and Nemotron 3 Super share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.7 has 39 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 3 Super has 21.