Model comparison
MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 51.9 to 14.2.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 48.5 | 33.0 |
| Released | 2026-09-21 | 2024-11-21 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.14 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.28 | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 53.4 (#30), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 36.0 (#214)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1504 | 1235 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1637 | — |
| SciCode | 51.3% | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 36.5 (#66), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 23.9 (#169)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1482 | 1220 |
| CritPt | 12% | — |
Math MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 51.9 (#52), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 14.2 (#303)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1468 | 1242 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 4.4% |
| ProofBench | 63% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 42.7% |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.2 (#99), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 25.0 (#264)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 46.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1501 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.5 (#47), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1259 | — |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.0 (#51), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 39.9 (#222)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1434 | 1236 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1511 | 1249 |
| LMArena Russian | 1409 | 1246 |
| LMArena French | 1475 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1456 | — |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 76.8 (#35), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 64.8 (#227)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1463 | 1233 |
Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#57), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 37.1 (#222)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1463 | 1224 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.1 (#67), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 45.6 (#223)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1455 | 1256 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1400 | 1231 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1451 | 1252 |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash better than Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B better for coding?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.4 versus 36.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 19 scored results on Noometry and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B has 14.