Model comparison

MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash Xiaomi

48.5

Rank #55 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 51.9 to 14.2.

Side by side

MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B specifications
MiMo-V2.6-FlashTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
ProviderXiaomiAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index48.533.0
Released2026-09-212024-11-21
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.14—
Output $ / M tokens$0.28—
Results tracked1914

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 53.4 (#30), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 36.0 (#214)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Coding15041235
LMArena WebDev1637—
SciCode51.3%—

Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 36.5 (#66), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 23.9 (#169)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Hard Prompts14821220
CritPt12%—

Math MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 51.9 (#52), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 14.2 (#303)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Math14681242
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—4.4%
ProofBench63%—
MATH Level 5—42.7%

Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.2 (#99), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 25.0 (#264)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
GPQA Diamond—46.3%
LMArena Expert1501—

Multimodal Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.5 (#47), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Vision1259—

Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.0 (#51), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 39.9 (#222)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Non-English14341236
LMArena Chinese15111249
LMArena Russian14091246
LMArena French1475—
LMArena Spanish1456—

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 76.8 (#35), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 64.8 (#227)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Instruction Following14631233

Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#57), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 37.1 (#222)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Longer Query14631224

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.1 (#67), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 45.6 (#223)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Text14551256
LMArena Creative Writing14001231
LMArena Multi-Turn14511252

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash better than Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.4 versus 36.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 19 scored results on Noometry and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper