Model comparison
MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Wizardlm 70b
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 70b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 63.1 to 34.8.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Wizardlm 70b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 48.5 | 33.0 |
| Released | 2026-09-21 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.14 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.28 | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 53.4 (#30), Wizardlm 70b: 31.4 (#285)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1504 | 1081 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1637 | — |
| SciCode | 51.3% | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 36.5 (#66), Wizardlm 70b: 20.7 (#234)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1482 | 1079 |
| CritPt | 12% | — |
Math MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 51.9 (#52), Wizardlm 70b: 32.2 (#218)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1468 | 1116 |
| ProofBench | 63% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.2 (#99), Wizardlm 70b: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1501 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.5 (#47), Wizardlm 70b: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1259 | — |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.0 (#51), Wizardlm 70b: 29.6 (#265)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1434 | 1078 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1511 | 1052 |
| LMArena Russian | 1409 | 1155 |
| LMArena French | 1475 | — |
| LMArena German | — | 1083 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1456 | — |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 76.8 (#35), Wizardlm 70b: 56.3 (#273)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1463 | 1093 |
Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#57), Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#263)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1463 | 1097 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.1 (#67), Wizardlm 70b: 34.8 (#269)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1455 | 1120 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1400 | 1149 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1451 | 1108 |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash better than Wizardlm 70b?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.4 versus 31.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Wizardlm 70b share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 19 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.