Noometry

Model comparison

Grok 4 vs Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B

Grok 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.1 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4 xAI

48.1

Rank #56 Confirmed

Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)

33.0

Rank #251 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4 scores higher in 8 categories and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Grok 4 leads 48.4 to 14.2.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 84% for Grok 4 and 4.4% for Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B.
  • Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok 4Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
ProviderxAIAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index48.133.0
Released2025-07-092024-11-21
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked4814

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 50.3 (#46), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 36.0 (#214)

BenchmarkGrok 4Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Coding14081235
Aider Polyglot79.6%—
WeirdML45.7%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 4: 32.3 (#68), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: —

BenchmarkGrok 4Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
Terminal-Bench27.2%—
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard63%—
GDPval21.1%—
Cybench43%—
DeepResearch Bench47.3%—
BALROG43.6%—
LMArena Search1142—
METR Time Horizons66.6%—

Reasoning Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 36.7 (#65), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 23.9 (#169)

BenchmarkGrok 4Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Hard Prompts14091220
ARC-AGI-216%—
SimpleBench60.5%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark73.6%—
ARC-AGI-166.7%—
Chess Puzzles28%—
Epoch Capabilities Index146.44—
ForecastBench60.9—

Math Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 48.4 (#64), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 14.2 (#303)

BenchmarkGrok 4Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202584%4.4%
LMArena Math14221242
Omni-MATH60.3%—
MATH Level 5—42.7%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)19.7%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)2.1%—

Knowledge Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 53.8 (#55), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 25.0 (#264)

BenchmarkGrok 4Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
GPQA Diamond87%46.3%
MMLU-Pro85.1%—
Confabulations12.4%—
GPQA (HELM)72.7%—
LMArena Expert1415—

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok 4: 33.7 (#94), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: —

BenchmarkGrok 4Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Vision1210—
GeoBench45%—

Multilingual Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 51.8 (#103), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 39.9 (#222)

BenchmarkGrok 4Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Non-English14031236
LMArena Chinese14271249
LMArena Russian14101246
LMArena French1418—
LMArena German1429—
LMArena Japanese1394—
LMArena Korean1377—
LMArena Spanish1420—

Instruction Following Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 79.2 (#5), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 64.8 (#227)

BenchmarkGrok 4Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Instruction Following13871233
IFEval94.9%—

Long Context Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 63.1 (#4), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 37.1 (#222)

BenchmarkGrok 4Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Longer Query14091224
Fiction.LiveBench94.4%—

Writing & Preference Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 58.5 (#116), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 45.6 (#223)

BenchmarkGrok 4Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Text14111256
LMArena Creative Writing13971231
LMArena Multi-Turn14161252
Short-Story Creative Writing76.9%—
WildBench79.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4 better than Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B?

Grok 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.1 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 4 or Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B better for coding?

Grok 4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.3 versus 36.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4 and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4 has 48 scored results on Noometry and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper