Model comparison
MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.4 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 42.0 to 18.0.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2.6-Flash | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 44.4 | 29.2 |
| Released | 2026-09-22 | 2024-12-31 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.14 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.28 | — |
| Results tracked | 13 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.3 (#68), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.1 (#309)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | — | 10.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1516 | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 29.6 (#82), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 14.8 (#312)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 16.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 20.6% |
| LiveBench | — | 22.1% |
Math MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 37.4 (#97), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 21.3 (#270)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | — | 15.6% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 13.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1477 | — |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.0 (#91), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.0 (#278)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 31% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 31.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1516 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.2 (#39), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1266 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.6 (#41), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1439 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1501 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1424 | — |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 77.0 (#33), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 61.1 (#243)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 60.6% |
| IFEval | — | 73% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1463 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#52), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1465 | — |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.9 (#61), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 43.0 (#226)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1459 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1408 | — |
| WildBench | — | 68.9% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1460 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 11.2% |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.4 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.3 versus 28.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Flash and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 13 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.