Noometry

Model comparison

Claude 3 Opus vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Opus Anthropic

29.5

Rank #310 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.6-Flash Xiaomi

48.5

Rank #55 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Opus scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Flash in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 51.9 to 14.8.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 3 OpusMiMo-V2.6-Flash
ProviderAnthropicXiaomi
Noometry Index29.548.5
Released2024-02-292026-09-21
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.14
Output $ / M tokens—$0.28
Results tracked4619

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Claude 3 Opus: 32.9 (#267), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 53.4 (#30)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Coding12641504
LMArena WebDev—1637
SciCode—51.3%
WeirdML19.2%—
BigCodeBench Instruct45.5%—
LiveBench Coding38.6%—
BigCodeBench Complete57.4%—
HumanEval+77.4%—
MBPP+73.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 24.6 (#116), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusMiMo-V2.6-Flash
Cybench10%—
METR Time Horizons29.5%—

Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Claude 3 Opus: 14.6 (#324), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 36.5 (#66)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Hard Prompts12451482
SimpleBench23.5%—
CritPt—12%
Chess Puzzles5%—
EnigmaEval0.8%—
LiveBench Reasoning40.6%—
DTBench61.6%—
LiveBench Data Analysis57.9%—
LMCA17%—
Epoch Capabilities Index126.91—
ForecastBench58.4—
LiveBench49.2%—
WinoGrande88.5%—

Math MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Claude 3 Opus: 14.8 (#299), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 51.9 (#52)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Math12731468
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.7%—
ProofBench—63%
LiveBench Math43.6%—
MATH Level 537.5%—

Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Claude 3 Opus: 24.5 (#267), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.2 (#99)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Expert12231501
GPQA Diamond47.2%—
SimpleQA Verified12.6%—
Confabulations22.7%—
MMLU84.6%—

Multimodal MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Claude 3 Opus: 27.1 (#116), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.5 (#47)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Vision10231259

Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Claude 3 Opus: 41.4 (#207), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.0 (#51)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Non-English12581434
LMArena Chinese12481511
LMArena French12751475
LMArena Russian12801409
LMArena Spanish12461456
LMArena German1258—
LMArena Japanese1204—
LMArena Korean1187—

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Claude 3 Opus: 64.1 (#228), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 76.8 (#35)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Instruction Following12481463
LiveBench Instruction Following63.9%—

Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Claude 3 Opus: 38.2 (#202), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#57)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Longer Query12591463

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Claude 3 Opus: 47.2 (#213), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.1 (#67)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text12621455
LMArena Creative Writing12351400
LMArena Multi-Turn12751451
LiveBench Language50.4%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Opus better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3 Opus or MiMo-V2.6-Flash better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.4 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Opus and MiMo-V2.6-Flash share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Opus has 46 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper