Model comparison
Gemma 2 27B vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 27B scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Flash in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 51.9 to 10.7.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.65 / $0.65 for Gemma 2 27B.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 8K.
Side by side
| Gemma 2 27B | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | |
| Noometry Index | 29.4 | 48.5 |
| Released | 2024-06-24 | 2026-09-21 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 8K | 1.05M |
| Max output | 2K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.65 | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.65 | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 34 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Gemma 2 27B: 34.1 (#246), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 53.4 (#30)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1211 | 1504 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1637 |
| SciCode | — | 51.3% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 42.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 36% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 52.5% | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Gemma 2 27B: 15.3 (#315), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 36.5 (#66)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1198 | 1482 |
| CritPt | — | 12% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 28.1% | — |
| DTBench | 48% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 47.9% | — |
| LMCA | 7.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 122.08 | — |
| LiveBench | 38.2% | — |
Math MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Gemma 2 27B: 10.7 (#311), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 51.9 (#52)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1212 | 1468 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.4% | — |
| ProofBench | — | 63% |
| LiveBench Math | 26.5% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 27.9% | — |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Gemma 2 27B: 19.0 (#280), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.2 (#99)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1172 | 1501 |
| GPQA Diamond | 36.5% | — |
| Confabulations | 27.1% | — |
| MMLU | 75.7% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 2 27B: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.5 (#47)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1259 |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Gemma 2 27B: 38.6 (#226), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.0 (#51)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1217 | 1434 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1221 | 1511 |
| LMArena French | 1247 | 1475 |
| LMArena Russian | 1234 | 1409 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1228 | 1456 |
| LMArena German | 1209 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1175 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1174 | — |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Gemma 2 27B: 60.5 (#249), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 76.8 (#35)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1206 | 1463 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 58.1% | — |
Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Gemma 2 27B: 37.3 (#218), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#57)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1231 | 1463 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Gemma 2 27B: 44.2 (#225), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.1 (#67)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1231 | 1455 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1241 | 1400 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1224 | 1451 |
| LiveBench Language | 32.6% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2 27B better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Gemma 2 27B or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Gemma 2 27B lists at $0.65 and $0.65.
Is Gemma 2 27B or MiMo-V2.6-Flash better for coding?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.4 versus 34.1 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 8K.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 27B and MiMo-V2.6-Flash share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 27B has 34 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 19.