Model comparison

Inkling vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B

Inkling is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.1 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Inkling leads 55.1 to 18.3.

Side by side

Inkling and OLMo 2 Furious 13B specifications
InklingOLMo 2 Furious 13B
ProviderThinking Machines LabAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index44.129.7
Released2026-07-152024-12-31
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window66K—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.87—
Output $ / M tokens$4.68—
Results tracked4112

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Inkling leads

Inkling: 34.5 (#234), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingOLMo 2 Furious 13B
FrontierCode14%—
LMArena WebDev1413—
FrontierSWE4.1%—
SciCode47%—
WeirdML32.3%—
LiveBench Coding—10.4%
LMArena Coding1464—
ALE-Bench946—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Inkling: 29.6 (#85), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingOLMo 2 Furious 13B
APEX-Agents33.8%—
τ²-bench Banking25%—

Reasoning Inkling leads

Inkling: 40.4 (#56), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingOLMo 2 Furious 13B
ARC-AGI-236.5%—
SimpleBench50%—
ARC-AGI-179.5%—
CritPt5.4%—
Chess Puzzles21%—
LiveBench Reasoning—16.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts1451—
DTBench87.5%—
LiveBench Data Analysis—20.6%
LMCA37.6%—
Epoch Capabilities Index148.54—
LiveBench—22.1%

Math Inkling leads

Inkling: 31.3 (#225), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingOLMo 2 Furious 13B
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)33.3%—
FrontierMath Tier 44.9%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202588.9%—
ProofBench0%—
Omni-MATH—15.6%
LiveBench Math—13.6%
LMArena Math1479—

Knowledge Inkling leads

Inkling: 55.1 (#49), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingOLMo 2 Furious 13B
GPQA Diamond88.3%—
SimpleQA Verified40.3%—
MMLU-Pro—31%
GPQA (HELM)—31.6%
LMArena Expert1465—

Multilingual Not comparable

Inkling: 54.0 (#52), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingOLMo 2 Furious 13B
LMArena Non-English1434—
LMArena Chinese1490—
LMArena French1458—
LMArena German1446—
LMArena Japanese1429—
LMArena Korean1404—
LMArena Russian1429—
LMArena Spanish1448—

Instruction Following Inkling leads

Inkling: 75.1 (#71), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingOLMo 2 Furious 13B
LiveBench Instruction Following—60.6%
IFEval—73%
LMArena Instruction Following1426—

Long Context Not comparable

Inkling: 43.8 (#86), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingOLMo 2 Furious 13B
LMArena Longer Query1434—

Writing & Preference Inkling leads

Inkling: 65.2 (#51), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingOLMo 2 Furious 13B
LMArena Text1441—
LMArena Creative Writing1387—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1611—
WildBench—68.9%
EQ-Bench 41226—
LMArena Multi-Turn1436—
LiveBench Language—11.2%

Frequently asked questions

Is Inkling better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?

Inkling is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.1 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Inkling or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?

Inkling scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.5 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Inkling and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Inkling has 41 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper