Model comparison
Mercury 2.5 vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B
Mercury 2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.5 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Mercury 2.5 leads 39.5 to 28.6.
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Mercury 2.5 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Inception | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 33.5 | 29.7 |
| Released | 2026-09-08 | 2024-12-31 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 260K | — |
| Max output | 66K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.04 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.15 | — |
| Results tracked | 4 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Mercury 2.5 leads
Mercury 2.5: 39.5 (#156), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313)
| Benchmark | Mercury 2.5 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 38.5% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 10.4% |
| ALE-Bench | 301.65 | — |
Reasoning Mercury 2.5 leads
Mercury 2.5: 22.4 (#193), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314)
| Benchmark | Mercury 2.5 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 16.3% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 20.6% |
| LiveBench | — | 22.1% |
Math Too close to call
Mercury 2.5: 23.3 (#272), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273)
| Benchmark | Mercury 2.5 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 3% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 15.6% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 13.6% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Mercury 2.5: —, OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283)
| Benchmark | Mercury 2.5 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 31% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 31.6% |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Mercury 2.5: —, OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248)
| Benchmark | Mercury 2.5 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 60.6% |
| IFEval | — | 73% |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Mercury 2.5: —, OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230)
| Benchmark | Mercury 2.5 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| WildBench | — | 68.9% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 11.2% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Mercury 2.5 better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?
Mercury 2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.5 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Mercury 2.5 or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?
Mercury 2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Mercury 2.5 and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mercury 2.5 has 4 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.