Model comparison

Mercury 2.5 vs Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#303); Mercury 2.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Mercury 2.5 Inception

30.2

Unranked Sparse

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct Microsoft

29.1

Rank #303 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads 29.2 to 22.4.
  • Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Mercury 2.5 and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct specifications
Mercury 2.5Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
ProviderInceptionMicrosoft
Noometry Index30.229.1
Released2026-09-082024-04-23
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window260K—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.04—
Output $ / M tokens$0.15—
Results tracked219

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Mercury 2.5: —, Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.3 (#307)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMercury 2.5Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
BigCodeBench Instruct—29.6%
LMArena Coding—1040
BigCodeBench Complete—40.6%
ALE-Bench301.65—

Reasoning Not comparable

Mercury 2.5: —, Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 18.7 (#254)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMercury 2.5Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts—1028

Math Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads

Mercury 2.5: 22.4, Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 29.2 (#220)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMercury 2.5Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
ProofBench3%—
LMArena Math—1089

Knowledge Not comparable

Mercury 2.5: —, Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.3 (#251)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMercury 2.5Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Expert—984

Multilingual Not comparable

Mercury 2.5: —, Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.4 (#280)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMercury 2.5Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Non-English—1000
LMArena Chinese—1016
LMArena French—1038
LMArena German—1006
LMArena Japanese—899
LMArena Korean—856
LMArena Russian—1004
LMArena Spanish—1058

Instruction Following Not comparable

Mercury 2.5: —, Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 52.1 (#289)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMercury 2.5Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following—1023

Long Context Not comparable

Mercury 2.5: —, Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.3 (#284)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMercury 2.5Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query—996

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Mercury 2.5: —, Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.3 (#296)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMercury 2.5Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Text—1050
LMArena Creative Writing—1024
LMArena Multi-Turn—989

Frequently asked questions

Is Mercury 2.5 better than Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct?

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#303); Mercury 2.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Mercury 2.5 and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mercury 2.5 has 2 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper