Model comparison
GPT-4.1 mini vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B
GPT-4.1 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.6 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 5 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4.1 mini scores higher in 5 categories and OLMo 2 Furious 13B in 1 category; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where GPT-4.1 mini leads 34.7 to 18.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MMLU-Pro: 78.3% for GPT-4.1 mini and 31% for OLMo 2 Furious 13B.
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-4.1 mini | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 33.6 | 29.7 |
| Released | 2025-04-14 | 2024-12-31 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 33K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.40 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.60 | — |
| Results tracked | 47 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-4.1 mini leads
GPT-4.1 mini: 30.6 (#293), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 23.9% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 32.4% | — |
| SciCode | 40.4% | — |
| WeirdML | 37.6% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 48.9% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 10.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1367 | — |
| CadEval | 16% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-4.1 mini: 33.3 (#55), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 50.5% | — |
Reasoning OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads
GPT-4.1 mini: 10.8 (#340), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 48.6% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 3.5% | — |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 16.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1349 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 7% | — |
| DTBench | 68.8% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 20.6% |
| LMCA | 21.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.01 | — |
| LiveBench | — | 22.1% |
Math GPT-4.1 mini leads
GPT-4.1 mini: 24.1 (#270), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 49.1% | 15.6% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 6.7% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 44.7% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 13.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1343 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 87.3% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 4.5% | — |
Knowledge GPT-4.1 mini leads
GPT-4.1 mini: 34.7 (#194), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 78.3% | 31% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 61.4% | 31.6% |
| GPQA Diamond | 65.8% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 12.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1338 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
GPT-4.1 mini: 35.8 (#82), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1181 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
GPT-4.1 mini: 45.7 (#166), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1318 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1329 | — |
| LMArena French | 1358 | — |
| LMArena German | 1351 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1290 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1298 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1324 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1319 | — |
Instruction Following GPT-4.1 mini leads
GPT-4.1 mini: 73.7 (#118), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 90.4% | 73% |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 60.6% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1333 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
GPT-4.1 mini: 31.8 (#275), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 44.4% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1344 | — |
Writing & Preference GPT-4.1 mini leads
GPT-4.1 mini: 48.6 (#199), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| WildBench | 83.8% | 68.9% |
| LMArena Text | 1340 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1300 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1147 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1354 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 11.2% |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-4.1 mini better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?
GPT-4.1 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.6 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is GPT-4.1 mini or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?
GPT-4.1 mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 30.6 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GPT-4.1 mini and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?
5 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4.1 mini has 47 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.