Inception, proprietary

Mercury 2.5

Mercury 2.5 by Inception ranks 242nd of 354 ranked models on the Noometry Index as of October 2026, with a score of 33.5. Its strongest category is coding, where it ranks 156th. API pricing starts at $0.04 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens, with a 260K-token context window.

Last verified

Specifications

Noometry rank
#242 of 354
Index score
33.5
Evidence
Reported 4 results
Provider
Inception
Released
September 8, 2026
Weights
Proprietary
Reasoning
Yes
Context window
260K
Max output
66K
Input price
$0.04 / M
Output price
$0.15 / M
Blended price
$0.0675 / M
Output speed
Not measured
Value
#8 of 219
Knowledge cutoff
November 2025
Input
text

Category scores

Each category score combines every public result we have in that category.

Mercury 2.5 category scores
  1. Coding 39.5
  2. Reasoning 22.4
  3. Math 23.3
Mercury 2.5 category ranks
CategoryScoreRankResults
Coding39.5#1561
Reasoning22.4#1931
Math23.3#2721

Strengths and weaknesses

Categories where Mercury 2.5 places highest and lowest among the models ranked in each, with its score against that category's median.

Strongest categories

Mercury 2.5: strongest categories
CategoryScorevs medianRank
Coding39.5+0.8#156 of 340, top 46%

Weakest categories

Mercury 2.5: weakest categories
CategoryScorevs medianRank
Math23.3−13.3#272 of 327, top 84%

Closest competitors

The models ranked just above and below Mercury 2.5. When scores are this close, price and speed are often the better way to choose.

Models ranked closest to Mercury 2.5
ModelRankScoreBlended $/MSpeed
Qwen3 8B#23833.7$0.31—Compare
Grok-2 (Dec 2024)#23933.7——Compare
GPT-4.1 mini#24033.6$0.7086Compare
GPT-5 Nano#24133.5$0.144Compare
Mistral Small#24333.4$0.26120Compare
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview#24433.4——Compare
Qwen2.5-Coder-32B#24533.4$0.74—Compare
Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024)#24633.2——Compare

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Benchmark results

Every published result we track, with its source. Bold rows are the ones used for ranking; where several exist we prefer independent runs over self-reported numbers.

Coding

Mercury 2.5 Coding benchmark results
BenchmarkScorePositionSettingSourceDate
SciCode38.5%#87 of 121, top 72%Epoch AI
ALE-Bench301.65#99 of 105, top 95%highEpoch AI

Reasoning

Mercury 2.5 Reasoning benchmark results
BenchmarkScorePositionSettingSourceDate
CritPt0%#121 of 134, top 91%Epoch AI

Math

Mercury 2.5 Math benchmark results
BenchmarkScorePositionSettingSourceDate
ProofBench3%#72 of 77, top 94%Epoch AI

API pricing by provider

Mercury 2.5 API prices
RouteInput $/MOutput $/MCached input $/MChecked
inception$0.04$0.15$0.0042026-10-10
openrouter$0.04$0.15$0.0042026-10-10

Compare Mercury 2.5

Other Inception models

Frequently asked questions

How good is Mercury 2.5?

Mercury 2.5 by Inception ranks 242nd of 354 ranked models on the Noometry Index as of October 2026, with a score of 33.5. Its strongest category is coding, where it ranks 156th. API pricing starts at $0.04 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens, with a 260K-token context window.

How much does Mercury 2.5 cost?

Mercury 2.5 costs $0.04 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens on Inception's own API, with cached input at $0.004.

What is Mercury 2.5's context window?

Mercury 2.5 accepts up to 260K tokens of input and can write up to 66K tokens in one response.

Is Mercury 2.5 open source?

No. Mercury 2.5 is proprietary and available only through Inception's API and partner platforms.

What are Mercury 2.5's strengths and weaknesses?

Relative to other ranked models, Mercury 2.5 places best in coding and lowest in math.

What is Mercury 2.5 best at?

Its best category is coding, where it ranks 156th on Noometry.