Model comparison

Magistral Medium vs Nova 2.0 Pro Preview

Magistral Medium is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.8 to 32.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Magistral Medium Mistral AI

34.8

Rank #224 Confirmed

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview Amazon

32.8

Rank #241 Reported

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Magistral Medium scores higher in 0 categories and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Nova 2.0 Pro Preview leads 21.7 to 8.7.
  • Magistral Medium has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Magistral Medium and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview specifications
Magistral MediumNova 2.0 Pro Preview
ProviderMistral AIAmazon
Noometry Index34.832.8
Released2025-03-172025-12-02
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window128K—
Max output16K—
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$5—
Results tracked223

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Nova 2.0 Pro Preview leads

Magistral Medium: 38.6 (#161), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 40.2 (#130)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumNova 2.0 Pro Preview
SciCode39.2%42.7%
LMArena Coding1319—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Magistral Medium: —, Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.9 (#127)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumNova 2.0 Pro Preview
GDP.pdf—2%

Reasoning Nova 2.0 Pro Preview leads

Magistral Medium: 8.7 (#342), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.7 (#189)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumNova 2.0 Pro Preview
CritPt0.3%0%
ARC-AGI-20%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark16.2%—
ARC-AGI-16.1%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1267—

Math Not comparable

Magistral Medium: 32.4 (#187), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumNova 2.0 Pro Preview
LMArena Math1249—

Knowledge Not comparable

Magistral Medium: 32.9 (#199), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumNova 2.0 Pro Preview
LMArena Expert1222—

Multilingual Not comparable

Magistral Medium: 39.8 (#219), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumNova 2.0 Pro Preview
LMArena Non-English1232—
LMArena Chinese1225—
LMArena French1268—
LMArena German1248—
LMArena Japanese1176—
LMArena Korean1125—
LMArena Russian1224—
LMArena Spanish1269—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Magistral Medium: 66.2 (#207), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumNova 2.0 Pro Preview
LMArena Instruction Following1254—

Long Context Not comparable

Magistral Medium: 39.3 (#178), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumNova 2.0 Pro Preview
LMArena Longer Query1295—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Magistral Medium: 46.5 (#214), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumNova 2.0 Pro Preview
LMArena Text1255—
LMArena Creative Writing1245—
LMArena Multi-Turn1275—

Frequently asked questions

Is Magistral Medium better than Nova 2.0 Pro Preview?

Magistral Medium is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.8 to 32.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Magistral Medium or Nova 2.0 Pro Preview better for coding?

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.2 versus 38.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Magistral Medium and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Magistral Medium has 22 scored results on Noometry and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper