Model comparison

Magistral Medium vs Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B

Magistral Medium is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.8 to 32.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Magistral Medium scores higher in 6 categories and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B in 2 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Magistral Medium leads 32.4 to 13.3.

Side by side

Magistral Medium and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B specifications
Magistral MediumTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
ProviderMistral AIAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index34.832.6
Released2025-03-172024-11-21
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K—
Max output16K—
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$5—
Results tracked2214

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Magistral Medium leads

Magistral Medium: 38.6 (#161), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 35.4 (#211)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Coding13191236
SciCode39.2%—

Reasoning Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads

Magistral Medium: 8.7 (#342), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 22.9 (#172)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Hard Prompts12671220
ARC-AGI-20%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark16.2%—
ARC-AGI-16.1%—
CritPt0.3%—

Math Magistral Medium leads

Magistral Medium: 32.4 (#187), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 13.3 (#297)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Math12491242
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—4.4%
MATH Level 5—42.7%

Knowledge Magistral Medium leads

Magistral Medium: 32.9 (#199), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 25.1 (#257)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
GPQA Diamond—46.3%
LMArena Expert1222—

Multilingual Too close to call

Magistral Medium: 39.8 (#219), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 40.1 (#217)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Non-English12321236
LMArena Chinese12251249
LMArena Russian12241246
LMArena French1268—
LMArena German1248—
LMArena Japanese1176—
LMArena Korean1125—
LMArena Spanish1269—

Instruction Following Magistral Medium leads

Magistral Medium: 66.2 (#207), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 65.0 (#222)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Instruction Following12541233

Long Context Magistral Medium leads

Magistral Medium: 39.3 (#178), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 37.1 (#217)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Longer Query12951224

Writing & Preference Too close to call

Magistral Medium: 46.5 (#214), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 45.8 (#218)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Text12551256
LMArena Creative Writing12451231
LMArena Multi-Turn12751252

Frequently asked questions

Is Magistral Medium better than Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B?

Magistral Medium is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.8 to 32.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Magistral Medium or Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B better for coding?

Magistral Medium scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.6 versus 35.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Magistral Medium and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Magistral Medium has 22 scored results on Noometry and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper