Model comparison
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview vs Qwen3 14B
Qwen3 14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.5 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Nova 2.0 Pro Preview scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3 14B in 1 category; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in agentic & tool use, where Qwen3 14B leads 29.6 to 21.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 42.7% for Nova 2.0 Pro Preview and 31.6% for Qwen3 14B.
- Qwen3 14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen3 14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 33.4 | 35.5 |
| Released | 2025-12-02 | 2025-04 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.35 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.40 |
| Results tracked | 3 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Nova 2.0 Pro Preview leads
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 40.8 (#133), Qwen3 14B: 37.3 (#195)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 42.7% | 31.6% |
Agentic & Tool Use Qwen3 14B leads
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.9 (#136), Qwen3 14B: 29.6 (#83)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 41% |
| GDP.pdf | 2% | — |
Reasoning Nova 2.0 Pro Preview leads
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 22.4 (#194), Qwen3 14B: 18.5 (#280)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | 0% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 49.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |
| DTBench | — | 64% |
| LMCA | — | 18.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 138.23 |
Math Not comparable
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, Qwen3 14B: 38.6 (#133)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 66.4% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, Qwen3 14B: 39.3 (#134)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 63.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.4% |
Long Context Not comparable
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, Qwen3 14B: 38.1 (#204)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 62.5% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Nova 2.0 Pro Preview better than Qwen3 14B?
Qwen3 14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.5 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Nova 2.0 Pro Preview or Qwen3 14B better for coding?
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.8 versus 37.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Nova 2.0 Pro Preview and Qwen3 14B share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nova 2.0 Pro Preview has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 14B has 12.