Model comparison
Longcat Flash Chat vs QwQ-32B
Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 39.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Longcat Flash Chat scores higher in 6 categories and QwQ-32B in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Longcat Flash Chat leads 61.0 to 50.6.
Side by side
| Longcat Flash Chat | QwQ-32B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meituan | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 42.1 | 39.8 |
| Released | — | 2024-11-28 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 36 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Longcat Flash Chat leads
Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#87), QwQ-32B: 35.4 (#226)
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1471 | 1333 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 20.9% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 44.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 72.2% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54.4% |
Reasoning QwQ-32B leads
Longcat Flash Chat: 19.0 (#272), QwQ-32B: 23.7 (#174)
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1440 | 1325 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 43.9% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 17.7% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 5% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 83.5% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 65% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 137.6 |
| ForecastBench | — | 58.3 |
| LiveBench | — | 72% |
Math Longcat Flash Chat leads
Longcat Flash Chat: 39.4 (#107), QwQ-32B: 38.0 (#143)
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1442 | 1359 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 59.2% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 77.8% |
Knowledge Longcat Flash Chat leads
Longcat Flash Chat: 40.6 (#116), QwQ-32B: 37.2 (#158)
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1454 | 1324 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 65.3% |
| Confabulations | — | 15.6% |
Multilingual Longcat Flash Chat leads
Longcat Flash Chat: 51.9 (#101), QwQ-32B: 44.8 (#176)
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1404 | 1305 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1465 | 1378 |
| LMArena French | 1456 | 1336 |
| LMArena German | 1408 | 1313 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1373 | 1262 |
| LMArena Korean | 1371 | 1279 |
| LMArena Russian | 1395 | 1297 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1445 | 1354 |
Instruction Following Longcat Flash Chat leads
Longcat Flash Chat: 74.4 (#96), QwQ-32B: 72.6 (#137)
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1411 | 1297 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 81.8% |
Long Context QwQ-32B leads
Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#93), QwQ-32B: 49.0 (#11)
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1425 | 1308 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 83.3% |
Writing & Preference Longcat Flash Chat leads
Longcat Flash Chat: 61.0 (#91), QwQ-32B: 50.6 (#180)
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1427 | 1329 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1388 | 1288 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1418 | 1314 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 80.2% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1257 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 51.4% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Longcat Flash Chat better than QwQ-32B?
Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 39.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Longcat Flash Chat or QwQ-32B better for coding?
Longcat Flash Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.5 versus 35.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Longcat Flash Chat and QwQ-32B share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Longcat Flash Chat has 19 scored results on Noometry and QwQ-32B has 36.