Model comparison

GLM-4.5V vs Longcat Flash Chat

Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 39.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

GLM-4.5V Z.ai (Zhipu)

39.2

Rank #158 Confirmed

Longcat Flash Chat Meituan

41.5

Rank #121 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.5V scores higher in 1 category and Longcat Flash Chat in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Longcat Flash Chat leads 61.2 to 52.7.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 59.8% for GLM-4.5V and 43.9% for Longcat Flash Chat.

Side by side

GLM-4.5V and Longcat Flash Chat specifications
GLM-4.5VLongcat Flash Chat
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)Meituan
Noometry Index39.241.5
Released2025-08-11—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window64K—
Max output16K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.60—
Output $ / M tokens$1.80—
Results tracked1519

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Longcat Flash Chat leads

GLM-4.5V: 38.9 (#152), Longcat Flash Chat: 42.9 (#85)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5VLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Coding13471471

Reasoning GLM-4.5V leads

GLM-4.5V: 26.5 (#118), Longcat Flash Chat: 18.3 (#267)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5VLongcat Flash Chat
Kagi LLM Benchmark59.8%43.9%
LMArena Hard Prompts13351440
NYT Connections (extended)—17.7%

Math Longcat Flash Chat leads

GLM-4.5V: 34.7 (#157), Longcat Flash Chat: 36.6 (#107)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5VLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Math13531441

Knowledge Longcat Flash Chat leads

GLM-4.5V: 36.8 (#155), Longcat Flash Chat: 40.0 (#111)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5VLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Expert13531454

Multimodal Not comparable

GLM-4.5V: 33.6 (#86), Longcat Flash Chat: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5VLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Vision1154—

Multilingual Longcat Flash Chat leads

GLM-4.5V: 44.9 (#172), Longcat Flash Chat: 52.1 (#95)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5VLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Non-English13041404
LMArena Chinese13381465
LMArena Russian12991396
LMArena Spanish13351445
LMArena French—1457
LMArena German—1409
LMArena Japanese—1373
LMArena Korean—1372

Instruction Following Longcat Flash Chat leads

GLM-4.5V: 69.4 (#170), Longcat Flash Chat: 74.6 (#92)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5VLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Instruction Following13111411

Long Context Longcat Flash Chat leads

GLM-4.5V: 39.6 (#166), Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#89)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5VLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Longer Query13051425

Writing & Preference Longcat Flash Chat leads

GLM-4.5V: 52.7 (#162), Longcat Flash Chat: 61.2 (#88)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5VLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Text13331427
LMArena Creative Writing12951388
LMArena Multi-Turn13331418

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-4.5V better than Longcat Flash Chat?

Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 39.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is GLM-4.5V or Longcat Flash Chat better for coding?

Longcat Flash Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.9 versus 38.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GLM-4.5V and Longcat Flash Chat share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.5V has 15 scored results on Noometry and Longcat Flash Chat has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper