Model comparison
QwQ-32B vs Solar Pro4
Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 39.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)
UpstageSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. QwQ-32B scores higher in 1 category and Solar Pro4 in 7 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where QwQ-32B leads 49.0 to 42.1.
- QwQ-32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| QwQ-32B | Solar Pro4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Upstage |
| Noometry Index | 39.8 | 42.1 |
| Released | 2024-11-28 | 2026-08-06 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 524K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 36 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Solar Pro4 leads
QwQ-32B: 35.4 (#226), Solar Pro4: 40.1 (#149)
| Benchmark | QwQ-32B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1333 | 1437 |
| Aider Polyglot | 20.9% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1371 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 44.6% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 72.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 54.4% | — |
Reasoning Solar Pro4 leads
QwQ-32B: 23.7 (#174), Solar Pro4: 28.5 (#104)
| Benchmark | QwQ-32B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1325 | 1399 |
| Chess Puzzles | 5% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 83.5% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 65% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 137.6 | — |
| ForecastBench | 58.3 | — |
| LiveBench | 72% | — |
Math Too close to call
QwQ-32B: 38.0 (#143), Solar Pro4: 38.8 (#128)
| Benchmark | QwQ-32B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1359 | 1416 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 59.2% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 77.8% | — |
Knowledge Solar Pro4 leads
QwQ-32B: 37.2 (#158), Solar Pro4: 39.8 (#129)
| Benchmark | QwQ-32B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1324 | 1427 |
| GPQA Diamond | 65.3% | — |
| Confabulations | 15.6% | — |
Multilingual Solar Pro4 leads
QwQ-32B: 44.8 (#176), Solar Pro4: 48.7 (#139)
| Benchmark | QwQ-32B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1305 | 1361 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1378 | 1415 |
| LMArena French | 1336 | 1397 |
| LMArena German | 1313 | 1364 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1262 | 1309 |
| LMArena Korean | 1279 | 1382 |
| LMArena Russian | 1297 | 1360 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1354 | 1401 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
QwQ-32B: 72.6 (#137), Solar Pro4: 72.7 (#132)
| Benchmark | QwQ-32B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1297 | 1377 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 81.8% | — |
Long Context QwQ-32B leads
QwQ-32B: 49.0 (#11), Solar Pro4: 42.1 (#130)
| Benchmark | QwQ-32B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1308 | 1381 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 83.3% | — |
Writing & Preference Solar Pro4 leads
QwQ-32B: 50.6 (#180), Solar Pro4: 56.5 (#138)
| Benchmark | QwQ-32B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1329 | 1386 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1288 | 1316 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1314 | 1385 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 80.2% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1257 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 51.4% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is QwQ-32B better than Solar Pro4?
Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 39.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is QwQ-32B or Solar Pro4 better for coding?
Solar Pro4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.1 versus 35.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do QwQ-32B and Solar Pro4 share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. QwQ-32B has 36 scored results on Noometry and Solar Pro4 has 18.