Model comparison

Llama 3.1-405B vs Qwen3.5 Plus

Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 30.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

Llama 3.1-405B Meta

30.7

Rank #288 Confirmed

Qwen3.5 Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

42.9

Rank #106 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.1-405B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5 Plus in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.5 Plus leads 49.6 to 18.4.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 9.7% for Llama 3.1-405B and 86.7% for Qwen3.5 Plus.
  • Llama 3.1-405B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Llama 3.1-405B and Qwen3.5 Plus specifications
Llama 3.1-405BQwen3.5 Plus
ProviderMetaAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index30.742.9
Released2024-07-232026-02-16
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.40
Output $ / M tokens—$2.40
Results tracked4215

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Llama 3.1-405B: 33.1 (#262), Qwen3.5 Plus: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BQwen3.5 Plus
WeirdML21.4%—
LMArena Coding1291—
ALE-Bench—621.92

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Llama 3.1-405B: 21.0 (#140), Qwen3.5 Plus: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BQwen3.5 Plus
TheAgentCompany7.4%—
Cybench7.5%—
Vending-Bench 2—0.54

Reasoning Qwen3.5 Plus leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 16.8 (#300), Qwen3.5 Plus: 32.8 (#74)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BQwen3.5 Plus
DTBench61.4%80.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index128.75146.78
SimpleBench23%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark45%—
Chess Puzzles—22%
LMArena Hard Prompts1269—
Mystery Game Puzzles—17%
LMCA—36.4%
BIG-Bench Hard82.9%—
ForecastBench59.9—
HellaSwag89.2%—
PIQA85.9%—
WinoGrande89.2%—

Math Qwen3.5 Plus leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 18.4 (#290), Qwen3.5 Plus: 49.6 (#61)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BQwen3.5 Plus
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20259.7%86.7%
Omni-MATH24.9%—
LMArena Math1281—
MATH Level 549.8%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—21%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—2.1%

Knowledge Qwen3.5 Plus leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 30.4 (#227), Qwen3.5 Plus: 46.0 (#83)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BQwen3.5 Plus
GPQA Diamond50.9%84.8%
SimpleQA Verified—25.4%
MMLU-Pro72.3%—
Confabulations17.6%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate—10.7%
GPQA (HELM)52.2%—
LMArena Expert1243—
ARC (AI2) Challenge95.3%—
MMLU84.5%—
TriviaQA82.7%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Llama 3.1-405B: 40.7 (#214), Qwen3.5 Plus: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BQwen3.5 Plus
LMArena Non-English1248—
LMArena Chinese1242—
LMArena French1279—
LMArena German1252—
LMArena Japanese1208—
LMArena Korean1184—
LMArena Russian1265—
LMArena Spanish1260—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Llama 3.1-405B: 65.9 (#214), Qwen3.5 Plus: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BQwen3.5 Plus
IFEval81.1%—
LMArena Instruction Following1259—

Long Context Qwen3.5 Plus leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 38.4 (#197), Qwen3.5 Plus: 43.0 (#113)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BQwen3.5 Plus
CL-bench—19.8%
CL-bench Life—12.4%
LMArena Longer Query1266—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Llama 3.1-405B: 38.9 (#251), Qwen3.5 Plus: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BQwen3.5 Plus
LMArena Text1284—
LMArena Creative Writing1262—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing870—
WildBench78.3%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1297—

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3.1-405B better than Qwen3.5 Plus?

Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 30.7 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3.1-405B and Qwen3.5 Plus share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.1-405B has 42 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Plus has 15.

Related comparisons

Go deeper