Model comparison

Llama 3.1-405B vs o3-pro

o3-pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 30.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 5 shared benchmarks.

Llama 3.1-405B Meta

30.7

Rank #288 Confirmed

o3-pro OpenAI

42.9

Rank #105 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.1-405B scores higher in 1 category and o3-pro in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in long context, where o3-pro leads 72.2 to 38.4.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is WeirdML: 21.4% for Llama 3.1-405B and 58.2% for o3-pro.
  • Llama 3.1-405B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Llama 3.1-405B and o3-pro specifications
Llama 3.1-405Bo3-pro
ProviderMetaOpenAI
Noometry Index30.742.9
Released2024-07-232025-06-10
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—200K
Max output—100K
Input $ / M tokens—$20
Output $ / M tokens—$80
Results tracked4212

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding o3-pro leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 33.1 (#262), o3-pro: 55.5 (#24)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405Bo3-pro
WeirdML21.4%58.2%
Aider Polyglot—84.9%
LMArena Coding1291—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Llama 3.1-405B: 21.0 (#140), o3-pro: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405Bo3-pro
TheAgentCompany7.4%—
Cybench7.5%—

Reasoning o3-pro leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 16.8 (#300), o3-pro: 23.8 (#171)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405Bo3-pro
Kagi LLM Benchmark45%72.1%
DTBench61.4%86.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index128.75147.42
ARC-AGI-2—4.9%
SimpleBench23%—
ARC-AGI-1—59.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts1269—
LMCA—38.5%
BIG-Bench Hard82.9%—
ForecastBench59.9—
HellaSwag89.2%—
PIQA85.9%—
WinoGrande89.2%—

Math Not comparable

Llama 3.1-405B: 18.4 (#290), o3-pro: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405Bo3-pro
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20259.7%—
Omni-MATH24.9%—
LMArena Math1281—
MATH Level 549.8%—

Knowledge Too close to call

Llama 3.1-405B: 30.4 (#227), o3-pro: 29.5 (#238)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405Bo3-pro
Confabulations17.6%14.2%
GPQA Diamond50.9%—
MMLU-Pro72.3%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate—23.3%
GPQA (HELM)52.2%—
LMArena Expert1243—
ARC (AI2) Challenge95.3%—
MMLU84.5%—
TriviaQA82.7%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Llama 3.1-405B: 40.7 (#214), o3-pro: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405Bo3-pro
LMArena Non-English1248—
LMArena Chinese1242—
LMArena French1279—
LMArena German1252—
LMArena Japanese1208—
LMArena Korean1184—
LMArena Russian1265—
LMArena Spanish1260—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Llama 3.1-405B: 65.9 (#214), o3-pro: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405Bo3-pro
IFEval81.1%—
LMArena Instruction Following1259—

Long Context o3-pro leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 38.4 (#197), o3-pro: 72.2 (#1)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405Bo3-pro
Fiction.LiveBench—97.2%
LMArena Longer Query1266—

Writing & Preference o3-pro leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 38.9 (#251), o3-pro: 57.1 (#133)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405Bo3-pro
LMArena Text1284—
LMArena Creative Writing1262—
Short-Story Creative Writing—84.4%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing870—
WildBench78.3%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1297—

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3.1-405B better than o3-pro?

o3-pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 30.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 3.1-405B or o3-pro better for coding?

o3-pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 33.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3.1-405B and o3-pro share?

5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.1-405B has 42 scored results on Noometry and o3-pro has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper