Model comparison

Qwen3.5 Plus vs Yi-1.5-34B

Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Qwen3.5 Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

42.9

Rank #106 Confirmed

Yi-1.5-34B 01.AI

30.6

Rank #289 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Qwen3.5 Plus scores higher in 4 categories and Yi-1.5-34B in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.5 Plus leads 46.0 to 14.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 84.8% for Qwen3.5 Plus and 32% for Yi-1.5-34B.
  • Yi-1.5-34B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Qwen3.5 Plus and Yi-1.5-34B specifications
Qwen3.5 PlusYi-1.5-34B
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)01.AI
Noometry Index42.930.6
Released2026-02-162024-05-13
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.40—
Output $ / M tokens$2.40—
Results tracked1521

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Qwen3.5 Plus: —, Yi-1.5-34B: 32.4 (#272)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5 PlusYi-1.5-34B
BigCodeBench Instruct—33.9%
LMArena Coding—1169
BigCodeBench Complete—43.8%
ALE-Bench621.92—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Qwen3.5 Plus: —, Yi-1.5-34B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5 PlusYi-1.5-34B
Vending-Bench 20.54—

Reasoning Qwen3.5 Plus leads

Qwen3.5 Plus: 32.8 (#74), Yi-1.5-34B: 22.5 (#191)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5 PlusYi-1.5-34B
Chess Puzzles22%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1160
Mystery Game Puzzles17%—
DTBench80.5%—
LMCA36.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index146.78—

Math Qwen3.5 Plus leads

Qwen3.5 Plus: 49.6 (#61), Yi-1.5-34B: 27.5 (#249)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5 PlusYi-1.5-34B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202586.7%—
LMArena Math—1182
MATH Level 5—25.5%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)21%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)2.1%—

Knowledge Qwen3.5 Plus leads

Qwen3.5 Plus: 46.0 (#83), Yi-1.5-34B: 14.8 (#295)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5 PlusYi-1.5-34B
GPQA Diamond84.8%32%
SimpleQA Verified25.4%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate10.7%—
LMArena Expert—1144

Multilingual Not comparable

Qwen3.5 Plus: —, Yi-1.5-34B: 32.3 (#256)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5 PlusYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Non-English—1121
LMArena Chinese—1213
LMArena French—1156
LMArena German—1111
LMArena Japanese—1021
LMArena Korean—1005
LMArena Russian—1091
LMArena Spanish—1121

Instruction Following Not comparable

Qwen3.5 Plus: —, Yi-1.5-34B: 59.2 (#257)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5 PlusYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Instruction Following—1139

Long Context Qwen3.5 Plus leads

Qwen3.5 Plus: 43.0 (#113), Yi-1.5-34B: 34.6 (#248)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5 PlusYi-1.5-34B
CL-bench19.8%—
CL-bench Life12.4%—
LMArena Longer Query—1143

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Qwen3.5 Plus: —, Yi-1.5-34B: 37.4 (#257)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5 PlusYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Text—1173
LMArena Creative Writing—1135
LMArena Multi-Turn—1153

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen3.5 Plus better than Yi-1.5-34B?

Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Qwen3.5 Plus and Yi-1.5-34B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Qwen3.5 Plus has 15 scored results on Noometry and Yi-1.5-34B has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper